|
| PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATIONS |
3. VEHICULAR POLLUTION IN DELHI: Writ Petition (Civil) No.13029/1985 (M.C.Mehta Vs UOI & Ors.)
This writ petition was filed in the year of 1985 under Article 21 of the Constitution of India regarding air pollution in Delhi. The Petitioner challenged the inaction on the part of the Union of India, Delhi Administration (now known as Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi) and other Authorities whereby smoke, highly toxic and other corrosive gases were allowed to pass into the air due to which the lives of the people of Delhi were put to high risk especially in thickly populated areas where most of the hazardous industries were functioning. The residents of the area were suffering from chronic ailments of nose, throat and eyes due to air pollution. The Petitioner prayed before the Hon’ble court that pollution is due to industries and vehicles and appropriate directions might be issued to the owners of vehicles emitting noxious carbon monoxides, oxides of nitrogen, lead and smoke from their vehicles. During the pendency of this Writ Petition, the Hon’ble Supreme Court passed several orders/directions to deal with the situations arising from time-to-time and impressed upon the concerned authorities to take urgent steps to tackle the acute problem of vehicular pollution in Delhi.
The important directions issued by the Hon’ble Court on 26.7.1998:
(i) augmentation of public transport to 10,000 buses by 1.4.2001;
The Hon’ble Supreme Court on 26.3.2001 further directed that in public interest and with a view to mitigate the sufferings of the commuter public in general and the school children in particular some relaxation and exemptions were given.
While dealing with the issues relating to conversion to CNG mode of public transport in NCT Delhi, the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 5.4.2002 further directed that under Articles 39(e), 47 and 48-A it is the duty of the of the State to secure the health of the people, improve public health and protect and improve the environment. The Hon’ble Court observed that the Environment (Prevention and Control) Authority was a statutory Authority constituted u/s 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and its directions were final and binding on all persons and organizations concerned. The directions of the said authority should be complied with.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court earlier extended the limit for the conversion of commercial vehicles to avoid the unnecessary hardship, the first time it was extended to 31.5.2001 and then to 31.1.2002. On 5.4.2002, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has relied on the judgment of Vellore Citizen Welfare Forum Vs Union of India & Others (1996) 5 SSC 64 in which precautionary principle and ‘polluter pays principle’ was discussed. The Hon’ble Court also referred various studies which co-related the increase of air pollution with increase in cardiovascular and respiratory diseases and also the carcinogenic nature of respirable suspended particulate matter (RSPM) – PM-10 (i.e. matter less than 10 microns in size). The Hon’ble Supreme Court also referred the CPCB Newsletter "Parivesh", published in September, 2001 relating to air pollution and human health, and observed that there was need to control air pollution, and one of the measures was to reduce the use of diesel.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court issued the following directions for compliance: