COMPARISION OF SAFETY ISSUES OF ALTERNATE FUELS


14.0 COMPARISION OF SAFETY ISSUES OF ALTERNATE FUELS

The criterion of safety is very important for selection of alternative transportation fuels. With the number of alternate fuelled vehicles increasing diverse issues on safety are emerging out. Safety analysis of the fuel on-board a vehicle is not the only requirement today, safety issues pertaining to bulk-transportation of the fuel, storage & handling, spills; leakages, etc. also need to be assessed today.

Tables-20 and 21 lists the safety aspects of different alternative fuels pertaining to transportation and storage of the fuels. Figures-4 to 8 describes some comparative properties of various alternative fuels. Table-22 shows the representative emissions from various alternative fuels.



Fig-4: Flash Point Temperatures for Alternate Fuels

Fig-5: Fuel Volatility- (RVP @ 38 Degrees C)



Table-22: Representative Emissions from Various Alternative Fuels
(g/bhp-h)-Heavy Duty Transient Tests

Fuel

PM

NOx

THC

CO

Toxic Wastes

Ozone Potential

Eqv. CO2-GHG

Diesel

2.000

4.60

0.750

2.00

0.005

0.80

342.2

Clean Diesel

0.050

4.60

0.175

2.00

0.05

0.70

368.0

MeOH(From NG)

0.035

2.25

0.275

0.50

0.05

0.65

400.9

CNG (Lean Burn)

0.050

3.00

1.200

0.35

0.00

0.40

285.5

CNG (Stoich)

0.025

1.40

0.730

1.00

0.00

0.40

302.2

LPG (Stoich)

0.050

0.90

1.050

7.00

0.00

0.65

384.2

EtOH(FromCorn)

0.050

5.00

0.500

0.50

0.05

0.80

229.1

LNG (Stoich)

0.025

1.38

0.730

1.00

0.00

0.40

499.7

H2DI(Steam reform)

0.025

3.00

0.000

0.00

0.00

0.10

389.0

Pb-acid Battery

0.000

0.00

0.000

0.00

SO2

0.10

307.7

PEM Fuel Cell (H2)

0.000

0.00

0.000

0.00

0.00

0.10

207.5

Pb-acid Battery/CNG

0.013

0.70

0.365

0.50

SO2

0.25

304.6

Pb-acidBattery/PEM- H2

0.000

0.00

0.000

0.00

SO2

0.10

257.2

Source: Hofeldt L.D.; "Alternative Fuel Technologies for Heavy Duty Vehicles:Performance, Emissions,
Economics, Safety and Development"-Report to the French Government.