MUNICIPAL
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT Solid
Waste Management in Metro cities and State Capitals CPCB
sponsored a project to NEERI on "Assessment of Status of Municipal Solid
Wastes Management in Metro Cities and State Capitals" with a view to establishing
database on National level for selected 59 cities. The selected cities include
35 metro cities and 24 State capitals. Objective of the study was to assess the
compliance status of 59 cities with Municipal Solid Wastes (Management & Handling)
Rules, 2000 and initiatives taken for improving solid waste management practices.
It has been
observed that initiatives for collection of waste from house-to-house and waste
segregation has been undertaken in only 7 cities, privatization of transportation
of waste has been done in 11 cities and waste processing facilities have been
set up in 15 cities. Ten waste processing facilities are based on composting;
one of these composting facilities has provision for energy recovery also, four
are based on vermi-composting, and one facility employs pelletisation and energy
recovery technology. None of the cities is having proper sanitary landfill site
and uncontrolled dumping of MSW has been observed in all but one cities. Leachate
collection is practiced in only two cities and gas collection in only one city. In
many cities, bio-medical waste (BMW) is getting mixed with MSW. Slaughterhouse
waste is not managed properly and is dumped at landfill site along with MSW in
all except 12 cities, which have made separate arrangements for collection of
such wastes. Studies
have revealed that waste generation rate varies from 0.12 to 0.60 kg per capita
per day. Analysis of physical composition indicates total compostable matter in
the waste is in the range of 40-60 percent while recyclable fraction was observed
between 10 and 25 per cent. The moisture content in the MSW was observed to vary
from 30 to 60 per cent while the C:N ratio was observed to be in the range of
20-40. Based
on the study, suggestive guidelines for management of MSW are indicated and each
local body will have to prepare detailed project report estimating requirement
of tools and equipment and fund estimates. Municipal
solid waste generation rates in 59 cities
|
S No |
Name of City |
Population (2001
census) |
Area (Sq. km) |
Waste Quantity (TPD) |
Waste Generation Factor
(kg/c/day) | | 1 |
Kavaratti |
10,119 |
4 |
3 |
0.30 | |
2 |
Gangtok |
29,354 |
15 |
13 |
0.44 | |
3 |
Itanagar |
35,022 |
22 |
12 |
0.34 | |
4 |
Daman |
35,770 |
7 |
15 |
0.42 | |
5 |
Silvassa |
50,463 |
17 |
16 |
0.32 | |
6 |
Panjim |
59,066 |
69 |
32 |
0.54 | |
7 |
Kohima |
77,030 |
30 |
13 |
0.17 | |
8 |
Port Blair |
99,984 |
18 |
76 |
0.76 | |
9 |
Shillong |
1,32,867 |
10 |
45 |
0.34 | |
10 |
Simla |
1,42,555 |
20 |
39 |
0.27 | |
11 |
Agartala |
1,89,998 |
63 |
77 |
0.40 | |
12 |
Gandhinagar |
1,95,985 |
57 |
44 |
0.22 | |
13 |
Dhanbad |
1,99,258 |
24 |
77 |
0.39 | |
14 |
Pondicherry |
2,20,865 |
19 |
130 |
0.59 | |
15 |
Imphal |
2,21,492 |
34 |
43 |
0.19 | |
16 |
Aizwal |
2,28,280 |
117 |
57 |
0.25 | |
17 |
Jammu |
3,69,959 |
102 |
215 |
0.58 | |
18 |
Dehradun |
4,26,674 |
67 |
131 |
0.31 | |
19 |
Asansol |
4,75,439 |
127 |
207 |
0.44 | |
20 |
Kochi |
5,95,575 |
98 |
400 |
0.67 | |
21 |
Raipur |
6,05,747 |
56 |
184 |
0.30 | |
22 |
Bhubaneswar |
6,48,032 |
135 |
234 |
0.36 | |
23 |
Tiruvanantapuram |
7,44,983 |
142 |
171 |
0.23 | |
24 |
Chandigarh |
8,08,515 |
114 |
326 |
0.40 | |
25 |
Guwahati |
8,09,895 |
218 |
166 |
0.20 | |
26 |
Ranchi |
8,47,093 |
224 |
208 |
0.25 | |
27 |
Vijaywada |
8,51,282 |
58 |
374 |
0.44 | |
28 |
Srinagar |
8,98,440 |
341 |
428 |
0.48 | |
29 |
Madurai |
9,28,868 |
52 |
275 |
0.30 | |
30 |
Coimbatore |
9,30,882 |
107 |
530 |
0.57 | |
31 |
Jabalpur |
9,32,484 |
134 |
216 |
0.23 | |
32 |
Amritsar |
9,66,862 |
77 |
438 |
0.45 | |
33 |
Rajkot |
9,67,476 |
105 |
207 |
0.21 | |
34 |
Allahabad |
9,75,393 |
71 |
509 |
0.52 | |
35 |
Vishakhapatnam |
9.82,904 |
110 |
584 |
0.59 | |
36 |
Faridabad |
10,55,938 |
216 |
448 |
0.42 | |
37 |
Meerut |
10,68,772 |
142 |
490 |
0.46 | |
38 |
Nashik |
10,77,236 |
269 |
200 |
0.19 | |
39 |
Varanasi |
10,91,918 |
80 |
425 |
0.39 | |
40 |
Jamshedpur |
11,04,713 |
64 |
338 |
0.31 | |
41 |
Agra |
12,75,135 |
140 |
654 |
0.51 | |
42 |
Vadodara |
13,06,227 |
240 |
357 |
0.27 | |
43 |
Patna |
13,66,444 |
107 |
511 |
0.37 | |
44 |
Ludhiana |
13,98,467 |
159 |
735 |
0.53 | |
45 |
Bhopal |
14,37,354 |
286 |
574 |
0.40 | |
46 |
Indore |
14,74,968 |
130 |
557 |
0.38 | |
47 |
Nagpur |
20,52,066 |
218 |
504 |
0.25 | |
48 |
Lucknow |
21,85,927 |
310 |
475 |
0.22 | |
49 |
Jaipur |
23,22,575 |
518 |
904 |
0.39 | |
50 |
Surat |
24,33,835 |
112 |
1000 |
0.41 | |
51 |
Pune |
25,38,473 |
244 |
1175 |
0.46 | |
52 |
Kanpur |
25,51,337 |
267 |
1100 |
0.43 | |
53 |
Ahmedabad |
35,20,085 |
191 |
1302 |
0.37 | |
54 |
Hyderabad |
38,43,585 |
169 |
2187 |
0.57 | |
55 |
Banglore |
43,01,326 |
226 |
1669 |
0.39 | |
56 |
Chennai |
43,43,645 |
174 |
3036 |
0.62 | |
57 |
Kolkata |
45,72,876 |
187 |
2653 |
0.58 | |
58 |
Delhi |
1,03,06,452 |
1483 |
5922 |
0.57 | |
59 |
Greater Mumbai |
1,19,78,450 |
437 |
5320 |
0.45 |
Municipal Solid Waste characterisation in
59 cities
| S No |
Name of City |
Compostables (%) |
Recyclables (%) |
C/N Ratio |
HCV* (Kcal/Kg) |
Moisture (%) |
| 1 |
Kavarati |
46.01 |
27.20 |
18.04 |
2242 |
25 |
| 2 |
Gangtok |
46.52 |
16.48 |
25.61 |
1234 |
44 |
| 3 |
Itanagar |
52.02 |
20.57 |
17.68 |
3414 |
50 |
| 4 |
Daman |
29.60 |
22.02 |
22.34 |
2588 |
53 |
| 5 |
Silvassa |
71.67 |
13.97 |
35.24 |
1281 |
42 |
| 6 |
Panjim |
61.75 |
17.44 |
23.77 |
2211 |
47 |
| 7 |
Kohima |
57.48 |
22.67 |
30.87 |
2844 |
65 |
| 8 |
Port Blair |
48.25 |
27.66 |
35.88 |
1474 |
63 |
| 9 |
Shillong |
62.54 |
17.27 |
28.86 |
2736 |
63 |
| 10 |
Simla |
43.02 |
36.64 |
23.76 |
2572 |
60 |
| 11 |
Agartala |
58.57 |
13.68 |
30.02 |
2427 |
60 |
| 12 |
Gandhinagar |
34.30 |
13.20 |
36.05 |
698 |
24 |
| 13 |
Dhanbad |
46.93 |
16.16 |
18.22 |
591 |
50 |
| 14 |
Pondicherry |
49.96 |
24.29 |
36.86 |
1846 |
54 |
| 15 |
Imphal |
60.00 |
18.51 |
22.34 |
3766 |
40 |
| 16 |
Aizwal |
54.24 |
20.97 |
27.45 |
3766 |
43 |
| 17 |
Jammu |
51.51 |
21.08 |
26.79 |
1782 |
40 |
| 18 |
Dehradun |
51.37 |
19.58 |
25.90 |
2445 |
60 |
| 19 |
Asansol |
50.33 |
14.21 |
14.08 |
1156 |
54 |
| 20 |
Kochi |
57.34 |
19.36 |
18.22 |
591 |
50 |
| 21 |
Raipur |
51.40 |
16.31 |
223.50 |
1273 |
29 |
| 22 |
Bhubaneswar |
49.81 |
12.69 |
20.57 |
742 |
59 |
| 23 |
Tiruvananthapuram |
72.96 |
14.36 |
35.19 |
2378 |
60 |
| 24 |
Chandigarh |
57.18 |
10.91 |
20.52 |
1408 |
64 |
| 25 |
Guwahati |
53.69 |
23.28 |
17.71 |
1519 |
61 |
| 26 |
Ranchi |
51.49 |
9.86 |
20.23 |
1060 |
49 |
| 27 |
Vijaywada |
59.43 |
17.40 |
33.90 |
1910 |
46 |
| 28 |
Srinagar |
6177 |
17.76 |
22.46 |
1264 |
61 |
| 29 |
Madurai |
55.32 |
17.25 |
32.69 |
1813 |
46 |
| 30 |
Coimbatore |
50.06 |
15.52 |
45.83 |
2381 |
54 |
| 31 |
Jabalpur |
58.07 |
16.61 |
28.22 |
2051 |
35 |
| 32 |
Amritsar |
65.02 |
13.94 |
30.69 |
1836 |
61 |
| 33 |
Rajkot |
41.50 |
11.20 |
52.56 |
687 |
17 |
| 34 |
Allahabad |
35.49 |
19.22 |
19.00 |
1180 |
18 |
| 35 |
Visakhapatnam |
45.96 |
24.20 |
41.70 |
1602 |
53 |
| 36 |
Faridabad |
42.06 |
23.31 |
18.58 |
1319 |
34 |
| 37 |
Meerut |
54.54 |
10.96 |
19.24 |
1089 |
32 |
| 38 |
Nasik |
39.52 |
25.11 |
37.20 |
2762 |
62 |
| 39 |
Varanasi |
45.18 |
17.23 |
19.40 |
804 |
44 |
| 40 |
Jamshedpur |
43.36 |
15.69 |
19.69 |
1009 |
48 |
| 41 |
Agra |
46.38 |
15.79 |
21.56 |
520 |
28 |
| 42 |
Vadodara |
47.43 |
14.50 |
40.34 |
1781 |
25 |
| 43 |
Patna |
51.96 |
12.57 |
18.62 |
819 |
36 |
| 44 |
Ludhiana |
49.80 |
19.32 |
52.17 |
2559 |
65 |
| 45 |
Bhopal |
52.44 |
22.33 |
21.58 |
1421 |
43 |
| 46 |
Indore |
48.97 |
12.57 |
29.30 |
1437 |
31 |
| 47 |
Nagpur |
47.41 |
15.53 |
26.37 |
2632 |
41 |
| 48 |
Lucknow |
47.41 |
15.53 |
21.41 |
1557 |
60 |
| 49 |
Jaipur |
45.50 |
12.10 |
43.29 |
834 |
21 |
| 50 |
Surat |
56.87 |
11.21 |
42.16 |
990 |
51 |
| 51 |
Pune |
62.44 |
16.66 |
35.54 |
2531 |
63 |
| 52 |
Kanpur |
47.52 |
11.93 |
27.64 |
1571 |
46 |
| 53 |
Ahemdabad |
40.81 |
11.65 |
29.64 |
1180 |
32 |
| 54 |
Hyderabad |
54.20 |
21.60 |
25.90 |
1969 |
46 |
| 55 |
Bangalore |
51.84 |
22.43 |
35.12 |
2386 |
55 |
| 56 |
Chennai |
41.34 |
16.34 |
29.25 |
2594 |
47 |
| 57 |
Kolkata |
50.56 |
11.48 |
31.81 |
1201 |
46 |
| 58 |
Delhi |
54.42 |
15.52 |
34.87 |
1802 |
49 |
| 59 |
Gr.Mumbai |
62.44 |
16.66 |
39.04 |
1786 |
54 |
Characterization
of Compost Quality and its Application in Agriculture India
has a good potential for the production and use of MSW based compost and sewage
sludge generated in various metros and municipalities. However, few studies have
been conducted on its safe and economic disposal and its application on agricultural
land in different cropping system. A
project taken up by Central Pollution Control Board with IARI attempts to cover
the safe and beneficial use of MSW compost and sewage sludge in agriculture vis
a vis its environmental impacts based on extensive experimentations and a review
of the scientific literature. Under the project, detailed studies on characterization
of compost quality and its application on agricultural crops. Seven compost plants
were studied for characterization of compost quality. Studies indicated that average
concentration of heavy metals in the raw waste that was fed to the various compost
plants was in the range of 47 to 185 mg per kg in respect of lead, 36 to 63 mg/kg
for nickel and 1.5 to 6.5 mg/kg for cadmium. The level of mercury in raw waste
was between 0.01 and 0.23 mg/kg. Heavy metals in the finished compost were ranging
as follows; Pb; 108-203 mg/kg; Ni- 8-80 mg/kg; Cd-3.8-12.4 mg/kg and mg – 0.01-0.31
mg/kg. It
has been observed that the growth attributes of wheat/ maize and vegetable crops
viz., plant height, number of cobs/tillers/m2, dry matter production and leaf
area index, were increased due to supply of nitrogen through combination of different
doses of urea with compost/ sewage sludge. Demonstration
Projects for solid waste management
CPCB
and MoEF have instituted a scheme for setting up of demonstration project for
solid waste management in accordance with MSW Rule. Objective of the scheme is
to demonstrate total implementation of MSW Rule. The scheme is on cost sharing
basis where concerned local body is required to contribute 50% of the total cost
of the project. Initially, the scheme is confined for one town in each State/UT.
The following project have been taken up or planned.
| S.No |
State |
Town |
Status |
| 1 |
West Bengal |
North Dum-Dum New
Barrakpore | Under
Implementation | | 2 |
UT Chandigarh |
Chandigarh |
Under Implementation |
| 3 |
Tamil Nadu |
Udumalpet |
Under Implementation |
| 4 |
Kerala |
Kozhikode |
Under Implementation |
| 5 |
Himachal Pradesh |
Mandi |
Under Implementation |
| 6 |
Andhra Pradesh |
Suryapet |
Under Implementation |
| 7 |
Nagaland |
Kohima |
Under Implementation |
| 8 |
Maharashtra |
Jalna |
Under Implementation |
| 9 |
Arunachal Pradesh |
Itanagar |
Under Implementation |
| 10 |
Sikkim |
South West District |
Under Implementation |
| 11 |
Tripura |
Agartala |
Under Implementation |
| 12 |
Gujarat |
Clusters of munici-palities
in Ahemdabad | Planned |
|