![]() |
![]() |
WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT
5.1 WATER QUALITY MONITORING NETWORK
Water quality monitoring is an important exercise, which helps in evaluating the nature and extent of pollution control required, and effectiveness of pollution control measures already in existence. It also helps in drawing the water quality trends and prioritising pollution control efforts. Keeping this in view, the Central Pollution Control Board in collaboration with State Pollution Control Boards has established the water quality network comprising of 784 stations spread over the country. The monitoring is done on monthly or quarterly basis in surface waters and half yearly in case of groundwater.
Monitoring Results
The monitoring results obtained during 2002 indicate that organic pollution continues to be the predominant form of pollution at aquatic resources. The organic pollution measured in terms of bio-chemical oxygen demand (BOD) & coliform count gives the indication of extent of water quality degradation. It is observed that nearly 60% of the observations out of 5000 observations, are having BOD recording less than 3 mg/l, 20-25% between 3-6 mg/l & 15% above 6 mg/l. Similarly total & fecal coliform, which indicate presence of pathogens in water, are also of major concern. Nearly half of the observations are having coliform more than 500 Nos./100 ml.
Water Quality Trend
An attempt is made to plot trends of percentage of observations obtained during last 10 years in different levels of pollution with respect to BOD & coliform. The trend is presented in Fig.5.1.
It is clear from the Fig.5.1 that there is a increasing trend in percentage of observations having BOD below 3 mg/l & colform below 500 Nos./100 ml. This indicate that there is a gradual improvement in water quality. However the percentage of observations having BOD more than 6 mg/l & coliform more than 5000 Nos./100 ml is also increasing.
This is due to the shifting of moderately polluted water bodies to higher
level of pollution as clear from the decreasing trend in the percentage of
observations having BOD between 3-6 mg/l and coliform between 500-5000 Nos./100
ml.
5.2 POLLUTED RIVER STRETCHES IN INDIA
The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) in collaboration with concerned State Pollution Control Boards is carrying out water quality monitoring at 784 locations. The monitoring data are compiled, analysed and compared with desired water quality in different water bodies. The monitoring programme helps in prioritising pollution control efforts, establishing water quality trends and evaluating effectiveness of pollution control measures already in existence. In order to prioritise the pollution control efforts, CPCB identifies areas of high priority based on the severity of the problem. In 1988-89, CPCB identified 10 problem areas and 10 polluted river stretch to concentrate the pollution control efforts the list of polluted stretches formed the basis for formulation of River Action Plan of the National River Conservation Directorate. The list was further extended based on increasing pollution problem in our country. The water quality data of Year 2000 and 2001 analysed and 86 polluted water bodies are identified. Among these 71 are rivers and 15 lakes and tanks (Table 5.1). These water bodies are not meeting the desired level of water quality for defined uses with respect to Bio-chemical Oxygen Demand. In the present exercise, those water bodies having BOD more than 6 mg/l are identified as polluted water bodies.
| State |
No. of Surface Water Bodies |
Rivers |
Lakes/Tanks/ Reservoirs/Drains |
|
Andhra Pradesh |
8 |
3 |
5 |
|
Assam |
2 |
2 |
- |
|
Delhi |
1 |
1 |
- |
|
Jharkhand |
1 |
1 |
- |
|
Gujarat |
10 |
9 |
1 |
|
Haryana |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Himachal Pradesh |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
Karnataka |
6 |
4 |
2 |
|
Madhya Pradesh |
5 |
4 |
1 |
|
Maharashtra |
15 |
15 |
- |
|
Meghalaya |
5 |
1 |
4 |
|
Orissa |
5 |
5 |
- |
|
Punjab |
3 |
3 |
- |
|
Rajasthan |
3 |
3 |
- |
|
Tamil Nadu |
7 |
7 |
- |
|
Sikkim |
1 |
1 |
- |
|
Uttar Pradesh |
8 |
8 |
- |
|
West Bengal |
1 |
1 |
- |
|
TOTAL |
86 |
71 |
15 |
|
River |
No. of Polluted Stretch |
|
Godavari |
2 |
|
Nagavalli |
1 |
|
Musi |
1 |
|
Kalong |
1 |
|
Bharalu |
1 |
|
Yamuna |
3 |
|
Subarnarekha |
1 |
|
Sabarmati |
1 |
|
Amlakhadi |
1 |
|
Shedi |
1 |
|
Damanganga |
1 |
|
Ambika |
1 |
|
Bhadar |
1 |
|
Khari |
1 |
|
Kolak |
1 |
|
Par |
1 |
|
Ghaggar |
3 |
|
Markanda |
1 |
|
Bhadra |
1 |
|
Tunga |
1 |
|
Kali |
1 |
|
Tungabhadra |
1 |
|
Khan |
1 |
|
Kshipra |
1 |
|
Chambal |
2 |
|
Tapi |
2 |
|
Kalu |
1 |
|
Ulhas |
1 |
|
Weinganga |
1 |
|
Panchganga |
1 |
|
Wardha |
1 |
|
Bhima |
1 |
|
Mula & Mutha |
1 |
|
Bhatsa |
1 |
|
Patalganga |
1 |
|
Kundalika |
1 |
|
Krishna |
1 |
|
Girna |
1 |
|
Nira |
1 |
|
Kharkhala |
1 |
|
Brahmani |
1 |
|
Ib |
1 |
|
Mahanadi |
1 |
|
Kuakhai |
1 |
|
Kathjodi |
1 |
|
Satluj |
1 |
|
Beas |
1 |
|
Banas/Berach |
1 |
|
Vaigai |
1 |
|
Palar |
1 |
|
Adyar |
1 |
|
Coovum |
1 |
|
Tambiraparani |
1 |
|
Noyyal |
1 |
|
Cauvery |
1 |
|
Ranichu |
1 |
|
Hindon |
1 |
|
Western Kali |
1 |
|
Buri Yamuna |
1 |
|
Kali Nadi Eastern |
1 |
|
Gomti |
1 |
|
Ganga |
2 |
|
Damodar |
1 |
|
TOTAL |
71 |
|
Tank/Lake/Drain/Pond etc. |
| 1. Kishtra Reddy Pet Tank, Andhra Pradesh |
| 2. Dharamsagar Tank, Andhra Pradesh |
| 3. Hussain Sagar Lake, Andhra Pradesh |
| 4. Sarronagar Lake, Andhra Pradesh |
| 5. Pulicate Lake, Andhra Pradesh |
| 6. Drain No. 8, Haryana |
| 7. Renuka Lake, Himachal Pradesh |
| 8. Heballa Valley Lake, Karnataka |
| 9. Ulsoor Lake, Karnataka |
|
10. Lower & Upper Lake, Madhya Pradesh |
|
11. Umiam Lake, Meghalaya |
|
12. Ward Lake, Meghalaya |
|
13. Umtrew Lake, Meghalaya |
|
14. Thadlaskena, Meghalaya |
|
15. Kankoria Lake, Gujarat |
The respective State Pollution Control Boards/ Pollution Control Committees were requested to take remedial measures and formulate action plans to restore the water quality of the water bodies.
5.3 WATER QUALITY OF MAJOR RIVERS
Water quality profiles of 14 major rivers as studied have been presented in Annexure V. For this purpose, the criteria parameters considered are DO, BOD and Total Coliforms. pH has not been plotted as it remained within desired levels at almost all monitored locations. The significant observations about the major rivers are presented below:
River Baitarni: DO values of this river stretch are meeting the desired class throughout the year. In case of BOD, the entire river stretch under monitoring is not meeting the desired class. Average values in first two locations are within the desired class for both BOD and Total Coliform, thereafter from Jajpur onwards it is never meeting the desired class for BOD. In case of Total Coliform, average values are beyond the desired class due to higher concentration up to 11,000 Nos./100ml in the stretch from Anandpur to Chandbali and at Dhamra, it has touched 21,000 Nos./100ml.
River Brahmani: DO values of this river stretch are meeting the desired class (3 mg/l) except one value in the month of July at Raurkela D/s. In case of BOD, there is much fluctuation in values. BOD values are observed violating the desired class at all the locations and touched 5 mg/l and 6 mg/l at D/s Pamposh and Kamalanga respectively. Total Coliform values are violating the desired class at D/s Pamposh, Rourkela D/s, Samal, Talcher U/s, Kamalanga, Dhamasala & Pattamundai. At other locations it is well within the limit of desired class
River Brahmaputra : DO values of water in this river stretch are meeting the desired class throughout the year. BOD values are meeting the desired class in the entire stretch except at Kherghat in the month of December (3.7 mg/l). Total coliform values were observed violating the desired class at all the locations.
River Cauvery : On an average DO & BOD values have been found meeting the desired class. But DO values were not within the desired level at Erode in the months of January (3.8 mg/l) & October (3.5 mg/l), at Mohanur in the month of August (0.5 mg/l), at Tiruchirappalli U/s in the month of May (4.8 mg/l), at Tiruchirappalli D/s in the months of January (3.8 mg/l), September (3.5 mg/l) and October (4.3 mg/l), at Trichy in the month of February (4.7 mg/l), at Pitchavaram all months except February & March and at Near Boarder in the month of March (1 mg/l). It is observed that BOD values was exceeding the desired limit at Erode, Mohanur, Thirumukkudal, Musiri, Tiruchirappalli U/s, Tiruchirappalli D/s, Trichy, Thanjavur, Pitchavaram and Near Boarder. Total Coliforms values were well within the desired class except at Napokulu Bridge. D/s in all months except June, at Kushal nagar U/s in all months, at Sri Rangapattanna all the months except January, Tiruchirappalli U/s in all the months except October, at Tiruchirappalli D/s in all the months except May & June and Trichy, Grand Anaicut in the months of March, April, June, August and September.
Eutrophication symptoms were observed at three locations Thirumukkudal, Musiri and Tiruchirappalli U/s. It seems that due to eutrophication, the oxygen concentration has risen upto 20 mg/l at Thirumukkudal, 17.9 mg/l at Musiri and 16.5 mg/l at Tiruchirappalli U/s, as the observations were taken during day time, when photosynthetic effects were prominent.
River Ganga : DO values have been meeting the desired level except at six locations (at Kanpur D/s, Varanasi U/s, Varanasi D/s, Trighat, Dakhineswar and Uluberia) in the river. In case of BOD, there is much fluctuation in values. Except at five locations (Buxar, Patna U/s, Khurji, Patna D/s, Rajmahal and Behrampur), BOD is exceeding the desired level at all other locations. Total Coliforms values were exceeding the desired level in the entire stretch and it is observed that concentrations were very high in the stretch from Behrampur to Palta (touched 3.5 million MPN/100ml at Behrampur in the month of September).
River Godavari : DO values have been observed meeting the desired class in the entire stretch except at Jayawadi dam in the month of June (4.2 mg/l) and at Nasik D/s in the months of January (4.2 mg/l), May (2.9 mg/l), June (4.3 mg/l), July (1.2 mg/l), October (4.9 mg/l) and November (2.1 mg/l). BOD values were violating the desired class at all the locations in the stretch. At Nasik D/s , it touched 66 mg/l in the month of July. Total Coliforms values were violating at all the monitoring stations except the two locations (Dhalegaon and Raher) in the stretch.
River Krishna : DO & Total Coliforms values were meeting the desired class except at Mahabaleshwar in the month of July (3.8 mg/l), at Rajapur weir in the months of January (4.6 mg/l), April (4.2 mg/l), at Kurundwad in the months of January (3.8 mg/l), April (3.9 mg/l) & Hamsala Deevi in the month of September (2.6 mg/l) and Total Coliforms at Rajapur Weir in the months of September (550 MPN/100ml), December (550 MPN/100ml) and at Tintini Bdg. in all the months except January, February, March, May touching the maximum value 500 MPN/100ml. BOD values were meeting the desired class after Kurundwad except at Thangadi for all the months having maximum of 3.6 mg/l and Hamsala Deevi in the months from May to September having maximum concentration of 10.5 mg/l. BOD values were not meeting the desired class in the stretch from Mahabaleswar to Kurundwad even in a single month monitored during the year.
River Mahanadi : In the entire stretch from Rudri U/s to Paradeep D/s, all DO values were meeting the desired class throughout the year. BOD values were observed violating (during certain months) at five locations at Hirakund Reservoir, Sambalpur U/s, Sambalpur D/s, Sonepur D/s and Cuttack D/s. At other locations it is meeting the desired class. Total Coliform values were not meeting the desired class in the stretch at Hirakud Reservoir, Sambalpur U/s, Sambalpur D/s, Cuttack U/s and Cuttack D/s. Total Coliforms values were meeting the desired class at other locations.
River Mahi : During the year, DO, BOD and Total Coliform values have been found meeting the desired class in the entire stretch from Badnawar to Vasad except BOD in the month of August (3.1 mg/l) at Sevalia.
River Narmada : DO values are meeting the desired class in the entire stretch except at Amarkantak in the months of February, April, May, June, August with minor deviations. In case of BOD & Total Coliforms, it is meeting the desired class in the stretch from D/s of Omkareshwar till end of the stretch upto Bharuch except Total Coliforms at Garudeshwar. In addition to this, all the values of Total Coliforms were meeting the desired class at Amarkantak, Mandla, Narsinghpur and Hoshangabad D/s.
River Penner : DO values are meeting the desired class at all the locations throughout the year. In case of BOD, minor violations (up to a maximum of 3.6 mg/l) in all the monitored locations were obsereved.
River Sabarmati : DO Values are violating the desired class at Railway Bridge in the months of January (3.0 mg/l), June (0.4 mg/l), July (1.3 mg/l), August (1.2 mg/l), October (1.4 mg/l), November (4.0 mg/l) and December (3.0 mg/l). At the same time maximum values of 19 mg/l in the month of April and 13 mg/l in the month of March were also observed due to eutrophication effect. At other locations, it is well within the limit of desired class. BOD and Total Coliform values were violating the desired class at all the monitored locations. At V.N. Bridge, BOD is violating in all the months touching the level of 517mg/l in the month of March and Total Coliforms value is 4.6 million MPN/100ml in the month of March at Railway Bridge and at Miroli Taluka. The Sabarmati river is probably the heaviest polluted river.
River Subarnarekha : DO & BOD values are meeting the desired class except BOD in the months of February (3.2 mg/l), April (4.6 mg/l) and May (3.8 mg/l) at Tata Nagar. Total Coliforms values were not meeting the desired class at all locations except at Chandil Bridge and observed more than 24,000 MPN/100ml at Ranchi, Jamshedpur and Tata Nagar.
River Tapi : DO values were found meeting the desired class at all the locations except in the month of April (5.8 mg/l) at Ajnand Village. BOD values were observed violating at all the locations except at Nepanagar. In addition to this, BOD values are always observed violating throughout the year at Ajnand Village, Bhusawal U/s and Uphad Village. Total coliform values were found meeting desired class at two locations i.e. Bhuswal U/s and Uphad Village.
5.4 SEWAGE MANAGEMENT IN GANGA BASIN
The major source of organic pollution in fresh water bodies is sewage because the cities and towns did not have adequate sewage treatment facilities. Untreated or improperly treated human wastes disposed into aquatic resources. At downstream, other city’s draw water for its water requirements. This constitute a big public health hazard in terms of their potential for spreading water borne diseases.
As per the recent estimate, out of 22,900 MLD of wastewater generated in the Ganga basin, only about 5,900 MLD (26%) is treated while as much as 17,000 MLD is disposed untreated. Twenty-seven cities have only primary treatment facilities and forty-nine have primary and secondary treatment facilities. The level of treatment available in cities with existing treatment plant varies from 2.5% to 89% of the sewage generated.
The river Ganga is the largest river in the country having catchment area of 861,404 square kilometres, covering 26.2 percent of total geographical area of the country. The river watershed spread over ten States, namely:- Uttaranchal, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal, Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Haryana, Madhya Pradesh and Delhi.
Urban population consisting of Class I Cities and Class II Towns in the Ganga basin is 57 million (as per 1991) which is projected to be over 72 million in 2002. There are 101 Class I cities and 122 Class II towns in the basin. The recent survey of Class I and Class II cities indicate that about 8,250 MLD wastewater is generated in the Ganga basin (Table 5.2), out of which treatment facilities are available only for 3,500 MLD of wastewater. Out of 3,500 MLD treatment capacity, 880 MLD has been created under Ganga Action Plan, 720 MLD under Yamuna Action Plan and about 2,189 MLD has been created by Delhi Government for restoration of water quality of river Yamuna. The treatment facilities at 48 additional towns along the Ganga and 23 towns on its tributaries/sub-tributaries are being created under Ganga Action Plan Phase-II and National River Action Plan. It is expected that after completion of these plans, an additional treatment capacity of about 1,500 MLD will be created. However, still there is a large gap between the wastewater generation (8,250 MLD) and treatment (3,500 MLD).
| Total
number of towns generating significant amount of sewage ( class I cities and class II towns ) |
222 | |
| Sewage generation from 222 towns |
8250 MLD |
|
| Sewage directly disposed into the Ganga river |
2538 MLD |
|
| Sewage disposed into tributaries of the Ganga |
4491 MLD |
|
| Sewage disposed on land or low lying areas |
1220 MLD |
|
| Sewage Treatment
capacity created under Ganga Action Plan Phase-I |
882 MLD | |
| Sewage treatment capacity created along the Yamuna | 2631 MLD | |
| Additional towns (48 towns) where sewage treatment capacity is being created under GAP Phase-II | 600 MLD | |
| Number of towns where sewage treatment capacity is beingcreated on tributaries of the Ganga | 750 MLD | |
Sewage Treatment Plants under the Ganga Action Plan
Central Pollution Control Board carried out a detailed study of Ganga river basin in 1983-84 which was culminated into an action plan to restore its water quality. The action plan was accepted by the Government of India for implementation in 1985-86 and on 14th June 1986 an ambitious plan called the Ganga Action Plan was launched with following objectives:
In order to achieve the objectives of improving the water quality, 261 scemes covering 25 class I cities of Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and West Bengal were taken up. It was targeted to intercept, divert and treat 873 million litres per day (MLD) of domestic wastewater, out of 1340 MLD being generated from the 25 class I cities in the states of Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and West Bengal. For controlling industrial pollution, 68 grossly polluted units discharging 260 MLD industrial wastewater into the river were taken up for close monitoring and forcing the industries to set up effluent treatment plant.
The Sewage Treatment Plants (STPs) were either upgraded or constructed to treat the domestic sewage by adopting treatment technologies, such as low cost waste stabilisation ponds, conventional Activated Sludge Process (ASP) Trickling Filter (TF) and Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) treatment systems (Table 5.3).
| Sl.No. | Treatment System | Nos. | Total Capacity of STP (MLD) | Names of towns |
|
1. |
Oxidation Pond |
11 |
134.04 |
UTTARANCHAL (1) Lakkar Ghat- Rishikesh UTTAR PRADESH(1)Farukhabad, BIHAR (2)Chapra, Patna Eastern Zone WEST BENGAL (9)South,Suburban, Bhatpara, Titagarh (2), Panihati, Bally, Kalyani, Bahrampore, Nabadwip |
|
2. |
Activated Sludge Process |
12 |
507.5 |
UTTARANCHAL (1) Kankhal-Hardwar UTTAR PRADESH(5) Kanpur,Alllahabad, Varanasi-BHU, Varanasi Dinapur & Varanasi SPT-DLW BIHAR (2) Patna - Saidpur,Patna, Beur WEST BENGAL (4) Garden Reach, Cossipore-Chitpur (Bangur), BhatparaB, Titagarh |
|
3. |
Trickling Filter |
5 |
134.26 |
West Bengal (5) Baranagar-Kamarhatti, Kalyani, Serampore, Howrah, Chandannagore |
|
4. |
RBRC |
1 |
0.33 |
UTTARANCHAL (1)Swargashram- Rishikesh |
|
5. |
UASB |
3 |
55 |
UTTAR PRADESH (3)Kanpur(2),Mirzapur |
|
6. |
Aerated Lagoon |
3 |
49.5 |
BIHAR(3) Patna-Sourthern Zone, Munger,Bhagalpur |
Note:- RBRC : Rotating Biological Rope Contractor, OP : Oxidation pond
ASP : Activated sludge process, UASB : Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket
AL : Aerated lagoon, TF : Trickling Filter
5.5 MONITORING OF RIVER YAMUNA FOR ASSESSMENT OF WATER QUALITY
Central Pollution Control Board is regularly monitoring river Yamuna at 19 locations from its origin at Yamunotri to its confluence with river Ganga, under National River Conservation Directorate (NRCD) sponsored project & under National Water quality Monitoring programme. The frequency of monitoring at each location varies with the significance and approach of respective location. The frequency of monitoring is once in a year at 2 locations viz. Yamunotri and Shyama Chetti, four times a year at three locations viz. Lakhwar Dam, Dak Pathar & Allahabad, while monthly at 14 locations.
Based on the water quality characteristics, 1376 km long Yamuna river stretch can be segregated into five stretches i.e. Himalayan stretch, Upper stretch, Delhi stretch, Mixed stretch and Diluted stretch. The water quality characteristics of these stretches are depicted in Table 5.4.
|
S. No. |
River Stretch | Stretch details | pH | Dissolved
Oxygen mg/l |
Biochemical Oxygen Demand mg/l | Total
Coliform Nos./100 ml |
Faecal
Coliform Nos./100 ml |
|
|
1. |
Himalayan Stretch |
172 km from origin to Tajewala barrage |
Min |
6.95 |
7.7 |
1 |
150 |
32 |
|
Max |
8.23 |
10.7 |
2 |
1230000 |
3200 |
|||
|
Av |
7.52 |
8.9 |
1 |
131605 |
653 |
|||
|
2. |
Upper stretch |
224 km from Tajewala barrage to Wazirabad barrage |
Min |
7.03 |
6.2 |
1 |
630 |
100 |
|
Max |
8.48 |
9.9 |
6 |
3820000 |
41000 |
|||
|
Av |
7.67 |
7.9 |
2 |
256911 |
2896 |
|||
|
3. |
Delhi stretch |
22 km from Wazirabad barrage to Okhla barrage |
Min |
6.81 |
NIL |
4 |
130000 |
5000 |
|
Max |
7.64 |
4.7 |
36 |
26100000 |
1570000 |
|||
|
Av |
7.16 |
0.8 |
18 |
4672084 |
270042 |
|||
|
4. |
Mixed stretch |
930 km Okhla barrage to river Chambal confluence |
Min |
6.74 |
NIL |
3 |
20000 |
110 |
|
Max |
9.39 |
22.7 |
42 |
243000000 |
1720000 |
|||
|
Av |
8.14 |
7.3 |
13 |
4483217 |
79405 |
|||
|
5. |
Diluted stretch |
628 km River Chambal confluence to river Ganga confluence |
Min |
7.05 |
5.5 |
2 |
14000 |
50 |
|
Max |
8.88 |
12.8 |
9 |
20300000 |
17000 |
|||
|
Av |
8.04 |
8.6 |
4 |
1790733 |
2549 |
As reflected from the water quality characteristics, the Delhi stretch of river Yamuna is critically polluted and having septic conditions. The mixed stretch is having both septic & eutrophic conditions. In this stretch the Agra city is the biggest contributor of pollution to the river. The water quality of river Yamuna at Agra is deteriorating because of construction of Gokul Barrage at upstream Agra, where the water is again blocked. During year 2002, the Bio-chemical oxygen demand at Agra downstream ranged between 8-42 mg/l, with annual average of 21 mg/l whereas Total coliforms varied from 4,60,000 to 24,30,00,000 Nos./100 ml. The major reason of pollution in river Yamuna is not only discharges from domestic and industrial sources but also over-exploitation of fresh water available in the river, which is essentially required to maintain self purification capacity of the river. In the entire stretch of Yamuna River, the water quality, specially in terms of Total coliform is not conforming with respective designated criteria.
Water Quality Status of River Yamuna in Delhi
The water quality of river Yamuna from origin upto Delhi u/s Wazirabad remains fairly good most of the time, while the river stretch from downstream Wazirabad Delhi to upstream Chambal confluence carries deteriorated water quality mainly because of contribution and impact of urban centers located on its bank. Out of 341 km stretch, 22 km of Delhi segment is most polluted. The main reason of pollution in this segment is the discharge from domestic and industrial sources. The Central Pollution Control Board is regularly monitoring Yamuna on monthly basis in Delhi segment at three locations i.e. Palla, Nizamuddin barrage and Okhla barrage. In addition, monitoring of 22 drains being undertaken regularly (20 drains joining the River Yamuna directly while two drains joins the canals), which are the major source of pollution to the river. The total calculated discharge of these 22 drains is approx. 47.73 m3 /sec, which contribute 259.61 tonnes of BOD load per day. From the total discharge from these drains, Yamuna receives more than 90% wastewater, while the wastewater contributed by other two drains joins canals. Accordingly, out of total BOD load of 259.61 tonnes, Yamuna receives 231.20 tonnes of BOD load per day and rest received by the canals (Table 5.5).
The Delhi segment of river Yamuna has oligotrophic head and saprobic tail end and characterized by high bacterial load (except at Palla location its appearance is cloudy) having high BOD with strong disagreeable odour. There is significant contrast in the water quality status of the river between upstream Wazirabad barrage (Palla) and downstream Wazirabad (Nizamuddin bridge and Agra Canal) (Table 5.6). The anaerobic condition in river is frequently reflected by masses of gaseous sludge rising from the bottom and floating at the water surface.
|
S. No. |
Drains |
Flow m3/sec |
% Contribution |
BOD Load |
% Contribution |
|
1. |
Najafgarh Drain |
22.87 |
47.91 |
67.43 |
25.97 |
|
2. |
Magazine Road |
0.09 |
0.19 |
2.30 |
0.89 |
|
3. |
Sweepers Colony |
1.18 |
2.47 |
0.57 |
0.22 |
|
4. |
Khyber Pass |
0.09 |
0.19 |
0.04 |
0.02 |
|
5. |
Metcalf Drain |
0.10 |
0.21 |
0.41 |
0.16 |
|
6. |
Mori Gate Drain |
0.62 |
1.30 |
5.93 |
2.28 |
|
7. |
Tonga Stand |
0.11 |
0.23 |
1.41 |
0.54 |
|
8. |
Civil Mill Drain |
0.04 |
0.08 |
0.20 |
0.08 |
|
9. |
Power House |
0.71 |
1.49 |
13.08 |
5.04 |
|
10. |
Moat Drain |
0.56 |
1.17 |
7.29 |
2.81 |
|
11. |
Sen Nursing Home |
1.21 |
2.54 |
23.33 |
8.99 |
|
12. |
Drain No. 12 A |
0.20 |
0.42 |
0.58 |
0.22 |
|
13. |
Drain No. 14 |
0.60 |
1.26 |
16.06 |
2.33 |
|
14. |
Barapulla Drain |
2.02 |
4.26 |
15.49 |
5.97 |
|
15. |
Maharani Bagh |
0.95 |
1.99 |
23.12 |
8.91 |
|
16. |
Kalkaji Drain |
0.08 |
0.17 |
0.29 |
0.11 |
|
17. |
Tuglakabad |
0.33 |
0.69 |
1.73 |
0.67 |
|
18. |
Shahdara Drain |
5.99 |
12.55 |
43.19 |
16.64 |
|
19. |
Sarita Vihar Drain (Joins canal) |
1.12 |
2.35 |
26.49 |
10.20 |
|
20. |
Drain Near LPG Plant |
0.48 |
1.01 |
2.73 |
1.05 |
|
21. |
Drain Near Bridge Sarita Vihar |
8.20 |
17.18 |
16.02 |
6.17 |
|
22. |
Tehkhand Drain (Joins canal) |
0.18 |
0.38 |
1.92 |
0.74 |
|
Total |
47.73 |
100 |
259.61 |
100 |
|
|
S. No. |
Monitored Location |
||||
|
Palla |
Nizamuddin Bridge |
Agra Canal (Okhla Barrage u/s) |
|||
|
1. |
pH |
Min |
7.03 |
6.81 |
6.87 |
|
Max |
8.38 |
7.54 |
7.64 |
||
|
Av |
7.64 |
7.13 |
7.18 |
||
|
2. |
Dissolved Oxygen, mg/l |
Min |
6.7 |
Nil |
Nil |
|
Max |
9.9 |
2.1 |
4.7 |
||
|
Av |
8.0 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
||
|
3. |
Bio-chemical Oxygen Demand, mg/l |
Min |
1 |
6 |
4 |
|
Max |
4 |
36 |
21 |
||
|
Av |
2 |
23 |
13 |
||
|
4. |
Total Coliforms Nos./100 ml |
Min |
3700 |
300000 |
130000 |
|
Max |
102000 |
26100000 |
10000000 |
||
|
Av |
37550 |
6909167 |
2435000 |
||
|
5. |
Faecal Coliforms Nos./100 ml |
Min |
120 |
31000 |
5000 |
|
Max |
6400 |
1570000 |
260000 |
||
|
Av |
1449 |
437917 |
102167 |
||
Min = Minimum; Max = Maximum; Av = Average
5.6 SEWAGE TREATMENT STATUS IN THE YAMUNA BASIN
Delhi generates about 3,600 MLD of wastewater, out of which treatment facility is available for only 2,109 MLD. It is observed that there is continuous effort by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi to augment the treatment capacity. However, the exponential population growth is nullifying the results.
Twelve towns in Haryana and 8 Towns in Uttar Pradesh are included for setting up of sewage treatment plants under Yamuna Action Plan. Two sewage treatment plants in Delhi also been constructed under this plan at Sen Nursing Home Drain and Delhi Gate Drain with a design capacity of 10 MLD each. Under the plan 34 STP’s are commissioned with a treatment capacity of 743.25 MLD (Table 5.7).
|
Sewage Treatment Plant |
Total Capacity (Million litres per day ) |
Actual Flow(Million litres per day ) |
|
Mehrauli |
22.7 |
Nil |
|
Vasant Kunj |
22.7 |
18.16 |
|
Okhla |
635 |
684.00 |
|
Najafgarh |
22.7 |
Nil |
|
Papan Kalan |
90.8 |
40.86 |
|
Kesho Pur |
327.5 |
338.21 |
|
Nilothi |
181.6 |
Under Construction |
|
Coronation Pillar |
178 |
123.57 |
|
Rohini |
68.1 |
Under Construction |
|
Narela |
45.4 |
1.68 |
|
Rithala |
363.2 |
198.45 |
|
Yamuna Vihar |
45.4 |
32.08 |
|
Kondli |
204.5 |
133.4 |
|
Sen Nursing Home |
10 |
9.08 |
|
Delhi Gate Rajghat |
10 |
10.69 |
|
Nehru Vihar Oxidation Pond |
27.24 |
8.1 |
|
Total |
2254.84 |
1598.28 |
Performance Monitoring of Sewage Treatment Plants (STP’s) under Yamuna Action Plan (YAP) (NRCD/MOEF Sponsored Project)
The National River Conservation Directorate, Ministry of Environment & Forests has assigned project to Central Pollution Control Board for Performance Monitoring of Sewage Treatment Plants under Yamuna Action Plan. The performance monitoring of five sewage treatment plants (four in Haryana and one in Delhi) is being continuously undertaken since May, 1999 on monthly basis (Table 5.8). 24 Hrs composite samples of STP influent and effluent (2 hourly interval) are being collected from influent and effluent channels and being analyzed for various physico-chemical parameters i.e. pH, Temperature, Suspended Solids, Volatile Suspended Solids, Dissolved Oxygen, BOD, COD, NO3,-N, NH3,-N, Phosphate, Total coliform, Faecal Coliform etc. In addition, the generated sewage sludge from STP is also being collected and analyzed for pH, Heavy metals (seven trace metals) and pesticides.
|
S. No. |
State |
Monitored STP |
Treatment Capacity |
Type of Treatment |
|
1. |
Delhi |
Sen Nursing Home |
10 MLD |
Aerobic |
|
2. |
Haryana |
STP Gurgaon |
30 MLD |
UASB |
|
STP Zone-I Faridabad |
20 MLD |
UASB |
||
|
STP Zone-II Faridabad |
45 MLD |
UASB |
||
|
STP Zone-III Faridabad |
50 MLD |
UASB |
Performance Monitoring of Oxidation Pond based Sewage Treatment Plants in Uttar Pradesh under Yamuna Action Plan
The monitoring of Oxidation Ponds in Uttar Pradesh as identified by National River Conservation Directorate, Ministry of Environment & Forests being undertaken by Central Pollution Control Board Laboratories in addition to STP’s already being monitored. Seven Oxidation ponds, as identified by National River Conservation Directorate (NRCD) are being monitored on monthly basis since January, 2002 (Table 5.9):
| S. No |
STP Location |
Capacity (MLD) |
|
1. |
Main Town, Vrindavan |
4.0 |
|
2. |
Kaliadah, Vrindavan |
0.5 |
|
3. |
Trans Yamuna, Mathura |
14.0 |
|
4. |
Masani, Mathura |
14.0 |
|
5. |
Trans Yamuna, Agra |
10.0 |
|
6. |
Buria Ka Nagla, Agra |
2.5 |
|
7. |
Main Town, Etawah |
10.0 |
Grab Samples are collected on monthly basis from inlet and outlet of each Oxidation Pond and analyzed for flow (analyzed in field, temperature (Analyzed in field), pH, Total Dissolved Solids, Total Suspended Solids, Chemical Oxygen Demand, Bio-chemical Oxygen Demand and Dissolved Oxygen (Analyzed in the field) apart from bacteriological parameters viz. Total Coliforms and Faecal Coliforms.
5.7 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT THROUGH BIO-MONITORING OF MAJOR WETLANDS IN WILDLIFE HABITATS OF INDIA
The wetlands are the richest and most biologically diverse ecosystem. Many wetlands in the country support spectacular diversity of wildlife. Some are centers of rare, threatened and endangered species. Many of them are home of rich variety of mammals, birds, amphibians and reptiles. There is also a phenomenal diversity of insects associated with wetlands. In recent years, wetlands have been the focus of innumerable studies. This is also the only ecosystem type to have its own international convention, namely, the convention on wetlands of International importance especially as waterfowl habitats better known as the Ramsar convention to which India is a signatory.
The high biological productivity and bio-diversity values of wetlands, and the sustenance that these habitats provide to communities, have long been realized. However, the contribution of wetlands in maintaining the food chain in open waters, and in providing a variety of services such as; water quality improvement, flood control, and ground water recharge, among others been emphasized in the context of conservation. With the increase in human population, pressure on land for agriculture, urban and industrial expansion, wetland habitats in India have been over exploited. In many cases, such human excesses have greatly reduced bio-diversity, thus upsetting the ecological balance decreasing the values of wetlands. The need and importance of wetlands in water quality management has been greatly realized for improving water quality and wetlands species as bio-indicators. The project studies are undertaken by Central Pollution Control Board at various wetlands in the country with following major objectives:
During the reporting year the bio-monitoring studies have been undertaken in vicinity of wetlands of important wildlife habitats in states of Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Punjab, Rajasthan and Meghalaya (Table 5.10).
|
S. No. |
State |
Wildlife Habitat |
District/Town/ Village |
Wetland |
Surface Water Resources |
Water Use Status |
|
1. |
Andhra Pradesh |
Coringa Wildlife Sanctuary |
East Godavari district Ramanapalam |
River Corangi |
River Godavari upstream at Rajamundry |
Drinking water Intake, religious activities, washing ghat, domestic and industrial waste water discharge, prawn and fish ponds. |
|
River Godavari downstream at Dowlaiswaram |
Irrigation, washing, bathing, fishing, boating, aquaculture |
|||||
|
River Corangi |
Aquaculture, Prawn and fish ponds, transportation through motor boats, Mangrove forest, bird sanctuary |
|||||
|
River Gaderu |
Commercial fishing, aquaculture, transport, confluence of river Godavari to Bay of Bengal, bird sanctuary, Mangrove forest |
|||||
|
Kolleru Wildlife sanctuary |
West Godavari District |
Kolleru Lake |
Godavari Canal at Chettipeta |
Hydel Power generation, fishing, irrigation, bathing, washing, industrial cooling, raw water source |
||
|
Circar Channel at Alapadu |
Boating, aquaculture, transportation through motor boats, bird sanctuary, fishing |
|||||
|
Srigavarapupadu channel |
Lotus cultivation, bird’s habitat, fishing, aquaculture, boating and drainage from villages |
|||||
|
Kolletikota |
Transport through motor boats, pumping water for fish ponds, cultivation, aquaculture, drainage of surface runoffs from villages, habitats for birds |
|||||
|
Upputeru Outlet Drain |
Aquaculture and cultivation, Kolleru lake outlet discharge, washing, cultivation, fishing, boating, birds habitat |
|||||
|
Polaraju Drain |
Domestic waste water and surface runoffs discharge to Kolleru lake, birds habitat, carrying industrial and domestic and agriculture runoffs joining Kolleru lake, raw water source to Kolleru lake |
|
S. No. |
State |
Wildlife Habitat |
District/Town/ Village |
Wetland |
Surface Water Resources |
Water Use Status |
|
Chinaedlagadi Drain |
Drain carrying surface water runoffs and domestic waste water joins Kolleru lake, water abstarction for fish pond, cultivation, fishing, bird’s habitat, raw water source to Kolleru Lake |
|||||
|
Pedaedlagadi Drain |
Domestic waste water discharge, surface runoffs, raw water source for Kolleru Lake, boating for transportation of construction material, feed and fertiliser for fish pond and aquaculture |
|||||
|
2. |
Arunachal Pradesh
|
D’Ering Memorial Wildlife Sanctuary |
East Siang District, Pasighat |
River Siang |
River Siang, River Sibia, River Geruing |
Wildlife sanctuary, Transport by ferry services, cultivation, forestry, bathing, fishing |
|
Dibang Wildlife Sanctuary |
Lower Dibang Valley Roing |
River Dibang |
River Dibang |
Fishing, Migratory bird’s habitat, Dibang Reserve Forest, Transport by ferry, cultivation |
||
|
River Ephipani |
Transport by boating, tourism, fishing, bathing |
|||||
|
ABA Nullah/ River Sisris |
Cultivation, fishing, bathing, transport through river, horticulture |
|||||
|
Mehao Wildlife Sanctuary |
Lower Dibang Valley, Roing |
Sally lake Resort |
Streams from catchment of Mehao Sanctuary |
Bird’s habitat, tourism, fish culture |
||
|
3. |
Assam |
Deepor Beel |
Guwahati |
Deepor Beel |
River Brahmaputra upstream at Tinsukhia NH-37 |
Transport in between Assam at Dhollaghat to Arunachal pradesh at Sotia ghat by ferry services, cultivation, fishing, Tea Estates |
|
River Brahmaputra Bamboo market , Guwahati NH-37 |
Bathing, religious activities, washing cloth, waste water discharge through drains |
|||||
|
Deepor Beel |
Migratory and Resident birds habitat, fishing, domestic and industrial waste water discharge, brick kilns |
|||||
|
Kaziranga National Park |
Sonitpur, Nagaon and Golaghat District |
Rongamotia Beel, Bhengrai Jan, Kalduwar Beel, Bhodia Jan, River Brahmaputra, Daflong Beel, River Jia-Didifaloo, Kawaimari Beel, Mona Beel, Karising Beel, Mihi Beel + Monidifaloo river, River Dhansiri |
River Brahmaputra, Flood waters |
Drinking, Bathing for wild animals like Buffalo, Rhino, Elephants, nesting habitats for migratory and resident birds, Waste water discharge of Numaligarh refinery, Surface run offs from Tea Estates, tree palntation in forest range |
||
|
4.
|
Bihar |
Braila Jubba Sahini Bird Sanctuary |
Vaishali Amthama |
Braila Jheel |
River Noon,Rainwater |
Agriculture, Fishing, Bird Sanctuary |
|
River Boya |
Outlet discharge of Braila jheel, cultivation, washing, bathing, surface drainage of Mahua village |
|||||
|
River Ganga and River Gandak |
Transport, bathing, religious activities, Dolphins habitat, cultivation |
|||||
|
Ecological Park |
Barauni Begusarai |
Ecopond 2 |
Waste water from Barauni Refinery |
Bird sanctuary, amusement park, boating |
||
|
Kusheshwar sthan Bird Sanctuary |
Darbhanga Birol |
Kusheshwar sthan at Kamala, Balan Kosi Sangam |
Sangam of river Kamala, Balan and Kosi |
Religious, bathing, washing, transport, through boating, tourism, bird’s habitat |
||
|
Shiv-Ganga Ghat |
Religious bathing, washing and offerings, bird’s habitat |
|||||
|
River Kamala |
Makhana cultivation in ponds in vicinity, cultivation, bathing, washing and religious activities, brick formation |
|||||
|
River Bhagmati |
Cultivation, religious ceremonies, brick formation, open defaecation |
|||||
|
River Buri Gandak at Pusa |
Cultivation, religious ceremonies, bathing, washing, open defaecation |
|
S. No. |
State |
Wildlife Habitat |
District/Town/ Village |
Wetland |
Surface Water Resources |
Water Use Status |
|
5. |
Delhi |
Chhawla Ecopark |
Chhawla |
Najafgarh |
Sahibi Nadi |
Bird sanctuary, Irrigation, Forestry |
|
6. |
Delhi, Uttar Pradesh |
Okhla Barrage Pakshi Vihar |
Gaziabad Janpad |
Okhla Barrage |
River Yamuna, Hindon Cut |
Migratory birds (Flamingoes) habitat, tourist resort at Kalindi Kunj, fishing, supply of irrigation water to Agra Canal, cultivation, cattle wading, discharge of domestic and industrial waste water of Delhi and Uttar Pradesh |
|
7. |
Haryana |
Sultanpur Bird sanctuary |
Gurgaon between Shadhrana and Sultanpur |
Samaspur lake |
Gurgaon water supply channel |
Migratory and resident birds habitat, cultivation, Tourism, surface runoff drainage |
|
8. |
Punjab
|
Harike Bird Sanctuary |
Ferozepur, Maku |
Harike wetland |
River Satluj Lohian Bridge |
Bird’s nesting habitats, Waste water discharge, cultivation |
|
Confluence of River Satluj and River Beas at Harike Barrage |
Bird sanctuary, Irrigation canals, cultivation, fishing, boating, tourism |
|||||
|
Kanjli Bird Sanctuary |
Kapurthalla Kanjli |
Kanjli wetland |
Kali bein rivulet of river Beas |
Bird’s habitat, waste water discharge, irrigation, brick kilns, tourism, boating |
||
|
Ropar Wetland |
Ropar |
Ropar Barrage |
River Satluj |
Bird’s habitat, Pinkassia tourist complex, boating, fishing, irrigation canals, cultivation, industrial and waste water discharge at upstream and downstream of barrage, cooling water intake for thermal power plants |
||
|
9. |
Rajasthan |
Keoladeo Bird Sanctuary |
Bharatpur |
Ghana Lake |
Ghana Canal from Ajanbund receiving water supply from river Gambir and Banganga tributaries of river Yamuna |
Bird Sanctuary, Nesting habitat in K-block and L-block of national park. Receiving surface run offs from surrounding residential and cultivated lands, domestic and industrial activities in the vicinity |
|
10. |
Uttar Pradesh
|
Nawabganj Bird Sanctuary |
Unnao, Nawabganj |
Nawabganj Lake |
Rain water harvest |
Tourism, brick kilns, pigs and cattle wading, forestry, surface runoffs from leather tanning and vegetable tanning industries |
|
Sandi Bird Sanctuary |
Hardoi, Sandi |
Sandi lake |
Rain water harvest |
Cultivation, grazing animals, bird’s habitat, surface drainage overflow during monsoon, brick kilns, dry lake during summer |
||
|
River Garrah |
Raw water source to Sandi lake through a channel during monsoon, bird’s resting habitat for migratory birds before reaching to sandy lake or during non-monsoon period |
|||||
|
Sur-Sarovar Bird sanctuary |
Agra-Keetham |
Keetham Lake |
Jodhpur branch of Agra Canal |
Water Intake for Mathura Refinery water treatment plant, Chlorination of Intake water, Bird’s nesting habitats, domestic and industrial waste water discharge through Agra Canal, Okhla Barrage |
||
|
Samaspur Bird sanctuary |
Rai Bareilly Samaspur |
Samaspur lake |
Rain water harvest, surface drainage |
Tourist resort, Migratory and residential bird’s habitat, drinking water, farming, cultivation, fishing, brick kilns, drainage discharge, cattle wading |
||
|
River sai |
Outlet discharge of Samaspur lake through drains, sewage and waste water discharge of Rai Bareilly, Leprosy Hospital on the bank |
|||||
|
11. |
Meghalaya
|
Chibragiri |
West Garo-Hills district Tura |
River Ganol |
River Ganol |
Tourism, Irrigation, bathing, washing, fishing |
|
Siju Wildlife sanctuary |
South Garo Hills, Siju |
River Simsang |
River Simsang |
Tourism, wildlife sanctuary, sand recovery, cultivation, fishing, bathing, forest range |
Bio-mapping of Perennial Rivers of Meghalaya
State – Case Study from North-east States
Meghalaya state is one of the important North-Eastern state, where the development is yet to be explored for agriculture and mineral based industries. Meghalaya state is bounded on the North by Goalpara, Kamrup, Nagaon, and Karbi Anglong district of Cachar and North Cachar Hills. The total area of state is 22429 km2 with a population of 2,306,069. There are ten important perennial rivers in the state spread over East Khasi Hills, West Khasi Hills, Jaintia Hills and West Garo Hills districts. The resources (Table 5.11) and their water use status (Table 5.12) is as below. The biomonitoring results are presented in Table 5.13.
|
S. No. |
River |
Total stretch (km) |
Location District |
Major towns covered |
|
1. |
Umkhrah |
25.6 |
East Khasi Hills |
Shillong |
|
2. |
Umshyrpi |
19.2 |
Shillong |
|
|
3. |
Umkhen |
716.8 |
Shillong and Jaintia Hills |
|
|
4. |
Umiam Mawphlang |
400.0 |
Umtyngagar Mawphlang, Shella |
|
|
5. |
Nonstoin |
30.0 |
West Khasi Hills |
Nongstoin |
|
6. |
Kynshi |
614.0 |
Sohiong, Ranikor |
|
|
7. |
Myntdu |
358.4 |
Jaintia Hills |
Jowai |
|
8. |
Lubha |
128.0 |
Sonapur Lumshnong |
|
|
9. |
Umngot |
384.0 |
Dawki |
|
|
10. |
Simsang |
588.0 |
West Garo Hills |
Williamnagar Baghmara |
|
S. No. |
Rivers/Water bodies |
Location of stretch |
Activities |
Environmental Problems |
||
|
1. |
River Umiam d/s
April, 2002 |
Greater Shillong Water Supply Scheme (GSWS), Mawphlong, East Khasi Hills District |
Water Intake point for GSWS, Power Station for pumping water, querying, fishing is done by using worms, potato cultivation, sherries, red rhododendron and black berry tree, forest of Pinus Khasiana, Temporary barrage across the river. Barapani Lake at d/s of river, Tourism, Hydroelectric power generation
|
Deforestation, silting in water body, outlet of GSWS drains, surface runoffs. Obstruction of fish migration and habitat destruction due to temporary barrage across the river. |
||
|
2. |
River Umiam Mawphlong d/s
May, 2002 |
Shella in East Khasi Hills District on the border of Bangladesh near Mawlong via Cherrapunjee |
Lime querying lime kilns, coal mining, stone crushing, Mawmluhcherra Cement company, cattle wading, washing, bathing, bamboo cultivation, vegetables mainly potato cultivation on the bank of river. Trans boundary influence from Bangladesh, Land sliding. |
Air quality, deforestation, silting in water body, water quality due to surface run offs, habitat destruction, mining activity leads to land sliding on the way of river flow. |
||
|
3. |
River Umiew upstream
April, 2002 |
Nongkrem village on the Smit – Nongkrem Road, East Khasi Hills District |
Construction of Road bridge, cattle wading, potato cultivation, cow dung, slurry from the adjacent dairy farm activities. Residential colonies in the near by areas, querying open defaecation. |
Water quality from surface run offs, deforestations, silting in water body. Habitat destruction due to construction activities. |
||
|
4. |
River Umiew downstream
April, 2002 |
D/s of Umtyngngar village, NH-40 on crossing of Shillong Cherrapunjee and Shillong-Dawki Highway after confluence to River Umtyngngar. Upper-Shillong East Khasi Hills District |
Massive querying and mining activities, constructions of road Bridge, Fishing, cultivation, stone crushing, hill sand recovery. Open defaecation, bathing etc. |
Silting and turbidity in water body. Surface run off from surrounding affect water quality, habitat destruction. |
||
|
5. |
River Umtyngngar upstream
May, 2002 |
Kyrgodmekhla village, Umtyngngar Road Bridge near Mawjrong town on NH-40 Shillong-Cherrapunjee Highway, East Khasi Hills District |
Radio transmission stations at Mawjrong town, querying, potato cultivation, spray of fertilizers in cultivated lands, forest of pinus Khasiana and Rhododerdron, washing, bathing, cattle wading, confluence of hill side tributary at upstream of road bridge. At downstream confluence with river Umiew |
Silting in water body, surface run off from surroundings, deforestation |
||
|
6. |
River Dienglieng (Wahdienglieng)
April, 2002 |
Near the Office of CPWD, Cleve Colony, Dhankheti, Shillong, East Khasi Hills District |
Fish ponds developed by Department of Fisheries. Fish ponds empty due to water scarcity. Pipe lines passing across the water body for transportation of supply water. Washing clothes, dense forest in the river valley, leaf litter falling in water body, open defaecation, forest of pinus Khasiana, open defaecation |
Surface run off from uphill, organic matter, very small stream of water body. Latchets of decomposed leaf litter enters through surface run off in to water body. |
||
|
7. |
River Umkaliar
April, 2002 |
Nongmynsong, Shillong, East Khasi Hills District |
Quarrying, deforestation, solid waste accumulation on the barrier on river. Near by spring water used for drinking purpose, slaughter house, washing |
Surface run offs from surrounding silting in water body, municipal waste accumulated at the barrier, habitat destruction due to various human activities. |
||
|
8. |
River Umkhrah upstream
April, 2002 |
Demthring spring near Road Bridge, Shillong, East Khasi Hills District |
Demthring spring water used for drinking, washing clothes etc., industrial and residential activities in the surrounding. Domestic wastewater and surface runoffs join at the origin of river at Demthring spring. Querying, stone crushing, brick formation, saw mill, tapping of ground water from querying, solid waste dumping directly in the stream. No plantation in the surrounding. Hill sand recovery.
|
Habitat destruction due to continuous human activities, silting, low flow in water body, water quality affected due to surface run off. Deforestation. |
||
|
9. |
River Umkhrah April, 2002 |
Risa Secondary School, Shillong, East Khasi Hills District |
Flows in the form of a drain in between residential colonies. Direct discharge of domestic waste. No plantation on the bank.
|
Water quality affected due to surface run off and habitat destruction. |
||
|
10. |
River Umkhrah midstream
April, 2002 |
Umpling, Shillong Near Bridge East Khasi Hills |
Residential colonies on the way to d/s. Collects spring water from hills, domestic wastewater, solid waste etc. is directly disposed off in the river. Automobile washing, open defaecation, bathing etc. Deforestation on the bank of river |
Surface runoff from surrounding silting in water body. Solid waste hinders the flow of water in the river. |
||
|
11. |
River Umkhrah downstream
April, 2002 |
Mawpdang, near Fire Station of Central Reserve Police Force Shillong, East Khasi Hills District |
Confluence of River Umshyrpi from MES Colony at upstream of the road bridge, receives wastewater discharge from entire city of Shillong, spring water, near the location is collected in a tank for washing, bathing and drinking purposes. Community drain from Mawprem joins the river, waste dumping on the banks. |
Water quality deterioration due to wastewater discharge directly from residential colonies, through drains. Solid waste accumulation in the river at various places. Habitat destruction, silting in water body. |
||
|
12. |
River Umshyrpi
April, 2002 |
MES Colony, 101 Army Head Quarter, near ASC Butchery Army Cantonment area, Rilbong Shillong, East Khasi Hills District |
Confluencing river Umkhrah at downstream of Shillong city at Mawpdang. Slaughterhouse waste dumping on the bank of river from ASC Butchery. Dairy farm activities, cattle wading, dumping of paddy husk, fish from slaughterhouse, manual incineration near the bank. |
Water quality deterioration due to organic matter, solid waste obstructs flow of river, silt and sedimentation in river, deforestation, and habitat destruction. |
||
|
13. |
River Motupun
May, 2002 |
Sderkariah village on the way from Laitryngew to Cherrapunjee on the NH-40, East Khasi Hills Districts |
Underground coal mining area, Lime caves on the way to river flow downstream, bathing, washing |
Surface run offs from coal mining area, sand deposition, silting in water body, coal ash deposition, habitat destruction.
|
||
|
14. |
River Mawkabor (IAPHATI)
May, 2002 |
Laitryngew, on the way to Cherrapunjee on NH-40, East Khasi Hills District |
Coal storage, coal processing, burning of coal, querying, stone crushing, confluence to other rivers in the valley downstream. Water of the stream stored at a barrier. |
Water quality affected due to surface run offs from coal mining area, deforestation and leads to silting of coal particles in water body, air quality and habitat destruction. |
||
|
15. |
River Laisdt
May, 2002 |
Mawkdok, Duman Singh Syiem, Dympen Bridge view point, Sohra East Khasi Hills District |
Heavy rainfall at Cherrapunjee, First civil and military station of the British on the Khasi – Jaintia Plateau. Tourist activity at monumental Nohsugithiang falls (Mawsmai falls), the epic Dain-thlen falls and the Nohkalikai falls, lime stone caves, sacred forest developed by Ramkrishna Mission. Cultivation of orange, Orchards and honey extracted from the Apiaries. Cement factory, confluence of several hill streams, querying, stone crushing, forest pine nursery. |
Land sliding, silting in water body, solid waste and surface run off from villages enter the streams. Pristine water from torrential rain |
||
|
S. No. |
Rivers |
Location of Stretch |
Temperature 0C |
Dissol-ved Oxygen mg/l |
pH |
Sap-robic score |
Diver-sity score |
Biolog-ical water quality class |
Biologi-cal water quality |
|
|
Air |
Water |
|||||||||
|
EAST KHASI HILLS DISTRICT |
||||||||||
|
1. |
Umian downstream |
Greater Shillong Water Supply Scheme (GSWS), Mawphlong |
17.0 |
16.0 |
9.4 |
7.2 |
7.8 |
0.2 |
A |
Clean |
|
2. |
Umian Mawphlong d/s |
Shella, Border of Bangladesh near Mawlong via Cherrapunjee |
35.0 |
27.0 |
7.2 |
- |
7.7 |
0.4 |
A |
Clean |
|
3. |
River Umiew upstream |
Nongkrem village 2.8 km from Smit on NH-44 |
18.0 |
15.0 |
7.0 |
7.5 |
4.5 |
0.7 |
C |
Moderate pollution |
|
4. |
Umiew d/s |
Umtyngngar d/s upper Shillong on NH-40 |
18.0 |
16.0 |
8.6 |
7.2 |
7.7 |
0.6 |
A |
Clean |
|
5. |
Umtyngngar u/s |
Kyrgodmekhla village Umtyngngar Road Bridge |
27.0 |
22.0 |
- |
- |
7.7 |
0.65 |
A |
Clean |
|
6. |
Dienglieng (Wahdienglieng) |
Office of theCPWD, Cleve Colony, Dhankheti, Shillong |
13.0 |
11.0 |
6.0 |
7.1 |
6.7 |
0.64 |
B |
Slight pollution |
|
7. |
Umkaliar |
Nongmynsong, Shillong |
16.0 |
13.0 |
7.0 |
7.2 |
4.7 |
0.4 |
C |
Moderate pollution |
|
8. |
Umkhrah u/s |
Demthring Spring near Road Bridge, Shillong |
- |
- |
6.4 |
5.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
E |
Severe pollution |
|
9. |
Umkhrah m/s |
Umpling, Near Bridge Shillong |
17.0 |
16.0 |
4.6 |
7.3 |
2.6 |
0.2 |
D |
Heavy pollution |
|
10. |
Umkhrah d/s |
Mawpdang, Near Fire Station of Central Police Force, Shillong |
17.0 |
14.0 |
6.0 |
7.2 |
3.4 |
0.7 |
C |
Moderate pollution |
|
11. |
Umshyrpi |
MES Colony, 101 Army HQ near ASC Butchery Rilbong, Shillong |
15.0 |
13.0 |
5.6 |
7.4 |
2.6 |
0.3 |
D |
Heavy pollution |
|
12. |
Motupun |
Sderkariah village on the way from Laitryngew to Cherrapunjee on NH-40 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4.5 |
0.8 |
C |
Moderate pollution |
|
13. |
Mawkabor (Iaphati) |
Laitryngew, Shillong – Cherrapunjee on NH-40 |
25.0 |
20.0 |
- |
5.6 |
6.0 |
0.21 |
C-D |
Moderate to Heavy pollution |
|
S. No. |
Rivers |
Location of Stretch |
Temperature 0C |
Dissol-ved Oxygen mg/l |
pH |
Sap-robic score |
Diver-sity score |
Biolog-ical water quality class |
Biologi-cal |
|
|
Air |
Water |
|||||||||
|
14. |
Laisdt |
Mowkdok, Duman Sing Syiem, Dympen Bridge view point, Sohra |
20.0 |
18.0 |
- |
- |
6.5 |
0.47 |
B |
Slight pollution |
|
JAINTIA HILLS DISTRICT |
||||||||||
|
1. |
Lubha upstream |
Sonapur, on Shillong – Jowai – Badarpur-Silchar Road, NH-44 Between Jowai and Silchar |
30.0 |
27.0 |
8.6 |
- |
7.1 |
0.8 |
A |
Clean |
|
2. |
Lubha downstream |
Sonapur at downstream of Lubha Road Bridge NH-44 |
31.0 |
27.0 |
8.4 |
- |
7.6 |
0.6 |
A |
Clean |
|
3. |
Thadlaskein Lake |
Mukhla, 56 km from Shillong, 8 km from Jowai on NH-44 |
24.0 |
21.0 |
7.4 |
6.5 |
5.3 |
0.56 |
C |
Moderate pollution |
|
4. |
Myntdu upstream |
Jowai 67 km from Shillong in eastern direction on NH-44 |
17.0 |
14.0 |
13.0 |
6.7 |
6.7 |
0.72 |
B |
Slight pollution |
|
5. |
Myntdu midstream |
Jowai, near road bridge, joining two hills |
- |
- |
9.5 |
7.5 |
7.1 |
0.65 |
A |
Clean |
|
6. |
Myntdu downstream |
Syntuksiar, Jowai, Jowai-Badarpur Road, NH-44 |
17.0 |
21.0 |
8.8 |
7.4 |
7.0 |
0.55 |
A |
Clean |
|
7. |
Umngot |
Dawki on Indo-Bangla Border, end of Guwahati-Shillong Dawki Road 96 km |
31.0 |
27.0 |
- |
- |
7.8 |
0.66 |
A |
Clean |
|
WEST GARO HILLS DISTRICT |
||||||||||
|
1. |
River Simsang |
William Nagar near Market East Garo Hills District |
16.0 |
15.0 |
6.0 |
6.2 |
0.4 |
C |
Moderate pollution |
|
|
Nangla Bibra, East Khasi Hills District |
24.0 |
19.0 |
5.0 |
- |
8.0 |
0.8 |
A |
Clean |
||
|
2. |
River Sampathar |
Nangla Bibra, East Garo Hills District |
24.0 |
19.0 |
3.0 |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
E |
Severe pollution |
|
3. |
River Simsang |
Dabakkol, 30 km north of Baghmara, Siju, South Garo Hills District |
18.0 |
17.0 |
6.5 |
- |
6.3 |
0.6 |
B |
Slight pollution |
|
4. |
River Rambha |
Tinali, Dilsa at Baghmara South Garo Hills District |
15.0 |
18.0 |
5-6 |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
E |
Severe pollution |
|
5. |
River Simsang |
Tinali, Dilsa at Baghmara, South Garo Hills District |
15.0 |
19.0 |
5.0 |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
E |
Severe pollution |
|
6. |
River Simsang |
After confluence of River Rambha, Tinali, Dilsa Baghmara, South Garo Hills District |
15.0 |
17.0 |
5.6-6.0 |
- |
6.0 |
0.2 |
C |
Moderate pollution |
|
7. |
River Simsang |
Downstream Baghmara near 161 BSF |
20.0 |
18.0 |
6.0 |
- |
6.0 |
0.5 |
B |
Slight pollution |
|
8. |
River Ganol |
9 km upstream Tura, near Road Bridge on NH-51, Chibragri West Garo Hills District |
20.2 |
17.0 |
6.0 |
- |
7.2 |
0.6 |
A |
Clean |
5.8 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF RAW WATER INTAKE SOURCES AT WATER TREATMENT PLANTS IN NCT – DELHI
The estimated water availability at NCT – Delhi from surface water sources viz. Yamuna, Ganga & Western Yamuna Canal is about 1150.2 mcm. The Yamuna river contributes a substantial part to this. Of the total 724 mcm water available in Yamuna river, (NCT Delhi share) the flood water is about 580 mcm, of which more than 50% could not being utilized but flows out of Delhi during monsoon season. It will be a definite foresight to trap and store this water for use during lean summer season.
The installed capacity of water treatment plants to meet drinking water requirements of Delhi is 631 MGD as on 31.3.2001. To mitigate drinking water scarcity, the water supply is augmented through ground water abstraction from river bed of Yamuna through Ranny wells. A substantial quantity of ground water is being withdrawn by private houses, hotels, hospitals, etc. At the end of 9th five year plan, the installed capacity of water treatment is proposed to be augmented to 980 MGD. The major part of potable water was treated at two water treatment plants installed and commissioned during British period viz. Chandrawal and Wazirabad on River Yamuna till the year 1993. Later the water treatment was augmented by installation of Haiderpur and Bhagirathi Water Treatment Plant. The raw water at Bhagirathi Water Treatment Plant is drawn from Upper Ganga Canal, which originates from Har-Ki-Pouri at Haridwar. After travelling almost 160 km from Haridwar upto Murad Nagar, the water from Upper Ganga Canal is drawn into a by-pass to Muradnagar Head works and from there to the Water Works, Delhi through 25 km conduit pipes of 2800 mm dia and 3250 mm dia. The part of the raw water at Bhagirathi Water Works is also drawn from river Yamuna at Wazirabad. The water from river Yamuna and Upper Ganga Canal are collected separately and mixed together before treatment at Bhagirathi Water Treatment Plant.
Two more water treatment plants were commissioned at Haiderpur in 1993 and 1995 on tail tributary of Western Yamuna Canal. Okhla Water Works is based on biological treatment process in Delhi using Ranny well water from the river bed of Delhi stretch of Yamuna. The water treatment capacities of these treatment plants had been augmented from time to time. The water treatment plants, their installed water treatment capacities & raw water sources is presented in Table 5.14.
With ever increasing population and rapid industrialization, the demand of fresh water is increasing day by day and simultaneously there is a growing threat to water quality deterioration in surface water sources, which are being used as raw water source for drinking water supply. Looking into the seriousness of the problem, the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) has conducted regular studies on water quality at raw water sources in NCT - Delhi, River Yamuna, Western Yamuna Canal (WJC) and Upper Ganga Canal, which are the main surface water sources for drinking water supply in Delhi. The findings on physico-chemical quality of raw water are presented in Tables 5.15, 5.16 and 5.17 ahead:
|
S. |
Water Treatment Plant |
Installed
|
Raw water source |
|
|
MCM/day |
MGD/day |
|||
|
1. |
Chandrawal I & II |
0.410 |
90 |
River Yamuna |
|
2. |
Wazirabad I, II, III |
0.546 |
120 |
|
|
3. |
Bawana |
- |
- |
|
|
4. |
Haiderpur I & II |
0.910 |
200 |
Western Yamuna Canal |
|
5. |
Nangloi |
0.182 |
40 |
|
|
6. |
Bhagirathi |
0.455 |
100 |
Upper Ganga Canal, U.P. |
|
7. |
Sonia Vihar |
- |
- |
|
|
8. |
Ranny Well/Tube wells |
0.369 |
81 |
Ground Water |
|
9. |
Okhla |
- |
- |
|
|
Total |
2.872 |
631 |
||
|
S. No. |
Raw Water Source |
Water Treatment Plant |
pH |
Conductivity (m mho/cm) |
COD (mg/l) |
BOD (mg/l) |
NH3N (mg/l) |
TDS (mg/l) |
||||||||||||
|
Min |
Max. |
Avg |
Min |
Max. |
Avg |
Min |
Max. |
Avg |
Min |
Max. |
Avg |
Min |
Max. |
Avg |
Min |
Max. |
Avg |
|||
|
1. |
River Yamuna |
Wazirabad |
6.91 |
8.83 |
7.89 |
186.0 |
416.0 |
307.4 |
2.0 |
14.0 |
8.2 |
<1 |
4.0 |
1.78 |
0.04 |
1.16 |
0.445 |
125.0 |
346.0 |
208.0 |
|
Bhagirathi |
7.39 |
8.89 |
7.99 |
167.0 |
423.0 |
298.2 |
<1 |
14.0 |
7.23 |
<1 |
2.0 |
1.48 |
0.086 |
0.715 |
0.318 |
90.0 |
280.0 |
186.0 |
||
|
2. |
Upper Ganga Canal |
Bhagirathi |
7.26 |
8.11 |
7.59 |
116.0 |
241.0 |
165.6 |
3.0 |
25.0 |
13.0 |
<1 |
2.0 |
1.23 |
0.049 |
1.08 |
0.647 |
63.0 |
196.0 |
110.4 |
|
3. |
Western Yamuna Canal (Tail tributary) |
Haiderpur |
7.18 |
7.82 |
7.46 |
136.0 |
251.0 |
184.4 |
<1 |
10.0 |
5.73 |
<1 |
2.0 |
1.48 |
0.274 |
1.3 |
0.803 |
90.0 |
194.0 |
124.6 |
|
BIS (1991) – Drinking Water Limits |
Desirable |
6.5-8.5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
500.0 mg/l |
|||||||||||||
|
Permissible |
No relaxation |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2000.0 mg/l |
||||||||||||||
|
S. No |
Raw Water Source |
Water Treatment Plant |
Total Alkalinity (mg/l) |
Total Hardness (mg/l) |
Calcium as Ca+2 (mg/l) |
Magnesium as Mg+2 (mg/l) |
Chloride (mg/l) |
Sulphate (mg/l) |
||||||||||||
|
Min |
Max |
Avg |
Min |
Max |
Avg |
Min |
Max |
Avg |
Min |
Max |
Avg |
Min |
Max |
Avg |
Min |
Max |
Avg |
|||
|
1. |
River Yamuna |
Wazirabad |
71.0 |
122.0 |
108.8 |
88.0 |
178.0 |
121.8 |
29.0 |
56.0 |
32.6 |
2.0 |
14.0 |
6.0 |
10.0 |
40.0 |
28.6 |
26.0 |
50.0 |
36.8 |
|
Bhagirathi |
84.0 |
158.0 |
116.2 |
86.0 |
162.0 |
114.2 |
24.0 |
41.0 |
31.0 |
3.0 |
18.0 |
10.8 |
5.0 |
35.0 |
20.0 |
23.0 |
59.0 |
38.4 |
||
|
2. |
Upper Ganga Canal |
Bhagirathi |
36.0 |
114.0 |
83.0 |
70.0 |
109.0 |
93.0 |
16.0 |
26.0 |
19.6 |
7.0 |
13.0 |
10.4 |
5.0 |
29.0 |
10.6 |
11.0 |
38.0 |
28.0 |
|
3. |
Western Yamuna Canal (Tail tributary) |
Haiderpur |
14.0 |
122.0 |
86.8 |
73.0 |
135.0 |
97.6 |
24.0 |
39.0 |
28.0 |
2.0 |
9.0 |
6.4 |
5.0 |
9.0 |
5.2 |
22.0 |
44.0 |
27.4 |
|
BIS (1991) – Drinking Water Limits (mg/l) |
Desirable |
200.0 |
300.0 |
75.0 (as Ca) |
- |
250.0 |
200.0 |
|||||||||||||
|
Permissible |
600.0 |
600.0 |
200 .0 (as Ca) |
- |
1000.0 |
400 .0 |
||||||||||||||
|
S. No. |
Raw Water Source |
Water Treatment Plant |
Phosphate (mg/l) |
Boron (mg/l) |
Fluoride (mg/l) |
Sodium (mg/l) |
||||||||
|
Min |
Max. |
Avg |
Min |
Max. |
Avg |
Min |
Max. |
Avg |
Min |
Max. |
Avg |
|||
|
1. |
River Yamuna |
Wazirabad |
0.032 |
0.146 |
0.0744 |
0.09/NT |
1.39 |
0.364 |
0.154 |
0.776 |
0.343 |
7.0 |
42.0 |
28.0 |
|
Bhagirathi |
0.022 |
0.169 |
0.06 |
0.036/NT |
1.45 |
0.352 |
0.193 |
0.458 |
0.241 |
4.0 |
93.0 |
42.0 |
||
|
2. |
Upper Ganga Canal |
Bhagirathi |
0.015 |
0.082 |
0.0345 |
0.272 |
0.94 |
0.522 |
0.086 |
0.466 |
0.289 |
2.0 |
22.0 |
8.0 |
|
3. |
Western Yamuna Canal (Tail tributary) |
Haiderpur |
0.33 |
0.59 |
0.48 |
0.09 |
0.83 |
0.409 |
0.11 |
0.499 |
0.293 |
4.0 |
20.0 |
7.75 |
|
BIS (1991) – Drinking Water Limits (mg/l) |
Desirable |
- |
1.0 |
1.0 |
- |
|||||||||
|
Permissible |
- |
5.0 |
1.5 |
- |
||||||||||
|
S. No. |
Raw Water Source |
Water Treatment Plant |
Potassium (mg/l) |
Nitrite (mg/l) |
Nitrate (mg/l) |
TKN (mg/l) |
||||||||
|
Min |
Max |
Avg |
Min |
Max |
Avg |
Min |
Max |
Avg |
Min |
Max |
Avg |
|||
|
1. |
River Yamuna |
Wazirabad |
2.0 |
9.0 |
6.0 |
0.009 |
0.572 |
0.141 |
0.317/NT |
1.01 |
0.555 |
0.60 |
3.34 |
1.41 |
|
Bhagirathi |
2.0 |
11.0 |
4.75 |
0.007 |
0.103 |
0.037 |
0.257/NT |
1.19 |
0.478 |
0.30 |
4.74 |
1.72 |
||
|
2. |
Upper Ganga Canal |
Bhagirathi |
2.0 |
5.0 |
3.25 |
0.003 |
0.007 |
0.0053 |
0.476/NT |
0.833 |
0.262 |
0.56 |
3.43 |
1.89 |
|
3. |
Western Yamuna Canal (Tail tributary) |
Haiderpur |
1.53 |
11.0 |
4.63 |
0.002 |
0.013 |
0.0068 |
0.039 |
0.754 |
0.283 |
0.81 |
2.12 |
0.928 |
|
BIS (1991) – Drinking Water Limits (mg/l) |
Desirable |
- |
- |
45 |
- |
|||||||||
|
Permissible |
- |
- |
100 |
- |
||||||||||
|
S. No. |
Raw Water Source |
Water Treatment Plant |
Cadmium (mg/l) |
Chromium (mg/l) |
Copper (mg/l) |
Iron (mg/l) |
Nickel (mg/l) |
Lead (mg/l) |
Zinc (mg/l) |
|
1. |
River Yamuna |
Wazirabad Water Works |
NT |
NT |
0.048 |
2.96 |
NT |
NT |
0.072 |
|
Bhagirathi Water Works |
NT |
NT |
0.048 |
4.60 |
0.004 |
NT |
0.244 |
||
|
2. |
Upper Ganga Canal |
Bhagirathi Water Works |
NT |
NT |
0.318 |
- |
NT |
NT |
0.152 |
|
3. |
Western Yamuna Canal (Tail tributary) |
Haiderpur Water Works |
NT |
NT |
0.048 |
7.24 |
NT |
NT |
0.048 |
|
BIS (1991) – Drinking Water Limits (mg/l) |
0.01 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.3 |
- |
0.05 |
5.0 |
||
|
No relaxation |
No relaxation |
1.5 |
1.0 |
- |
No relaxation |
15 |
|||
5.9 GROUNDWATER SURVEY
Groundwater Survey for the Problem areas
In the 29th Conference of the Chairmen & Member Secretaries of Central Board and State Pollution Control Boards, it was decided that an integrated approach towards environmental management was necessary for pollution related matters in the problem areas. CPCB had initially identified 22 problem areas and subsequently two more problems areas were identified. CPCB had conducted a major groundwater quality monitoring program at 22 problem areas during year 1994 and the findings were brought out as CPCB publications series GWQS/1 to 4 / 1995-96.
In the current programme, it is proposed to conduct another round of groundwater quality monitoring at all the identified problem areas through Zonal Offices of CPCB. The reports will be brought in a staggered manner and the first part is under finalisation, wherein the data will be interpreted along with data of surveys already available with the Central Ground Water Board. The participating agencies are listed in Table 5.18 below.
|
Executing agency |
Problem areas (24 areas) |
|
CPCB ZO - Kanpur |
Parwanoo , Kala-Amb , Singrauli, Govindgarh (4 areas) |
|
CPCB ZO - Bangalore |
Manali, North Arcot, Greater Cochin, Bhadravathi, Vishakapatnam, Bolaram-Patancheru (6 areas) |
|
CPCB ZO - Bhopal |
Pali, Jodhpur, Korba, Ratlam-Nagda (4 areas) |
|
CPCB ZO - Vadodara |
Vapi, Ankleshwar, Chembur, Tarapur |
|
CPCB, H.O., Delhi (Laboratory) |
Najafgarh Drain Basin area |
|
CPCB ZO - Shillong |
Digboi |
|
CPCB ZO - Kolkata |
Durgapur, Howrah, Dhanbad (3 areas) |
|
Orissa PCB |
Angul, Talcher |
Durgapur, West Bengal
The sampling locations (Table 5.19) and groundwater resources of Durgapur (Table 5.20) are presented below. The salient observations for the problem area Durgapur are given below:
|
Location |
Approx. Depth(m) |
Type |
Current use |
|
Mayabazar |
25-30 |
Tubewell |
Drinking & domestic purposes |
|
Ashisnagar |
25-30 |
Tubewell |
-do- |
|
Sagarbhanga |
15-20 |
Dugwell |
-do- |
|
Ganatantra Colony |
15-20 |
Dugwell |
-do- |
|
Palasdiha |
15-20 |
Dugwell |
-do- |
|
Area (sq.km) |
379.40 |
|
Utilizable GW resources (85% of gross) MCM |
62.7535 |
|
Net annual GW draft (70% of gross) MCM |
0.33 |
|
Balance GW resources MCM |
62.4235 |
|
Level of GW development (%) |
0.52 |
Vapi, Gujarat
Vapi in Gujarat is one of the biggest industrial estates with 1,800 industrial units in about 1,140 hectares of land. The groundwater samples collected from this problem area reveal that the Total Dissolved Solids were exceeding the limit of 500 mg/l and total hardness values were within the limit. The values of sulphate and nitrite were within the limit, but the conductivity values were ranging between 1,880 to 1,940 µmhos/cm, indicating contamination from surface pollutants. The measured values of chloride and fluoride were within the limit at IOC Godown, but values were exceeding at Charwad Road Station. The counts of Total Coliform and Fecal Coliform were below detectable limit except at IOC Godown during first round. There is a possibility of sewage contamination at this point. The concentrations of magnesium and calcium were exceeding at IOC Godown. Groundwater quality of Vapi has been presented in Fig 5.2.



Ankleshwar, Gujarat
The groundwater samples collected from Ankleshwar, another problem area in Gujarat, reveal that the Total Dissolved Solids were high in concentration, and total hardness was exceeding the limits. The values of sulphate and chloride were exceeding the limits. The value of nitrite was observed within the limit near CETP and Bharuch Naka. The concentration of fluoride was within the limit. Total Coliform and Faecal Coliform were not detected at Piraman School, however, both were found at Bharuch Naka. Total coliform was present near CETP, but faecal coliform could not be detected. The measured sodium values were 67-400 mg/l near CETP, 490-610 mg/l at Piraman School and 790-870 mg/l at Bharuch Naka. The groundwater quality data has been depicted in Fig 5.3.



Najafgarh Drain Basin Area, Delhi
Three rounds of Samplings were undertaken at 15 locations on the Najafargh drain Basin area. Analysis of around 40 physico-chemical parameters including Heavy Metals and Pesticides were completed .
North Arcot District (Vellore District), Tamil Nadu.
There are around 450 tanneries are located and functioning in Vellore District. 356 tanneries are connected to common effluent treatment plant. 95 tanneries are having individual treatment plant. Tannery treated/untreated effluent discharges into land, river etc. and contaminate the ground water and river water. To assess the impact of tannery effluent on ground water, 14 ground water samples were collected in Vellore District. The study revealed that salt content and heavy metal content, Total Coliform and Faecal Coliform content are high. This may be due to tannery industries and dyeing industry treated and untreated effluent discharges to the land and ground water source.
Manali - Chennai, Tamil Nadu.
Many medium scale and large scale industries are located in Manali Industrial area in Chengalpet District. The Industrial area is 20 KM from Chennai. The industries discharging, treated/untreated effluent into Buckingham Canal and Bay of Bengal. In order to study the impact of industries on ground water quality, 6 sampling stations were selected for study. The ground water sampling were carried out in the month of September, 2001, January, 2002 and May, 2002. The study results indicates that the ground water of the area was polluted in respects with salinity of ground water, TDS, Total Hardness & Bacteriological parameters.
Bhadravathi, Karnataka.
The ground water quality at Bhadravathi, critically polluted area in Karnataka state was monitored for the months of September, 2001, January, 2002 and may, 2002 at different locations namely Amirjan Colloy, Baba Halli and Machenahalli. These all three stations ground water bore well is mainly used for drinking and domestic purposes. The Bhadravathi ground water was found with high TDS, Total Hardness, Chlorides and Microbial presence and shows that the ground water has become polluted and not fit for potable use.
Vishakapatnam, Andhra Pradesh.
There were 7 Nos. ground water samples stations selected. Ground water samples were collected in the months of September, February, 2002 and October, 2002 by CPCB, South Zonal Office, Bangalore and analysed by Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board Laboratory. Most of the ground water stations were found polluted by Total Coliform. Mindi, Pedchantya, R.K. Puram station are highly polluted area and Nitrate, Sulphate were very high. Vishakapatnam do not have adequate sewage treatment plant to completely treat their municipal sewage.
Bollaram Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh.
The Patancheru and Bollaram is one of the problem area identified in the Country to monitor the ground water quality. Seven stations in different villages were selected. The CPCB, South Zonal Office, Bangalore carried out the monitoring in the months of September, 2001, January, 2002 and October, 2002. The samples were analysed for 35 parameters by Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board Laboratory. The industries located at Bollaram-Patancheru area are falling into a broad category from leather and slaughter houses for manufacturing/formulating pesticides and bulk drugs. Treated/untreated effluent is being discharged out side the industrial premise. Lakadaram, Kistyareddy peta, Bollaram, Isakabavi were highly polluted area, Kardoor, Kardanoor, Inale, Bachupalli by stations were moderately polluted. In ground water samples TDS, Total Hardness, sulphate were high Heavy metals and Total Coliform and Faecal Coliform were present in some of the monitoring stations.
Cochin, Kerala.
The Cochin ground water quality monitoring was carried out by CPCB in the month of September, 2001, January, 2002 and May, 2002. The samples were analysed by Kerala Pollution Control Board Lab. In cochin organised sewage systems does not extend beyond the corporation limit. Most of the houses have individual soak pit and septic tanks. There are about 15 major industries in this area medium and small scale industries spread through out the study area. Most of ground water pH were acidic. This may be due to soil condition/industrial pollution. Heavy metals and fecal coliform. Total Coliform was found in most of the ground water. Pesticide, phosphate and cyanide were not traceable. Many of the monitoring points surrounded by the industries are reported to be unfit for drinking purpose.
Nagda & Ratlam (M.P.)
Ratlam is emerging as a big commercial and industrial city. A number of small and large industries, producing wide range of products, are located in the industrial area near the city. About 20 odd industries are also running in the Nagda including Grasim Industries. Three locations at Nagda and seven locations at Ratlam were selected for the evaluation of groundwater quality. The groundwater sources were handpumps, dugwells and tubewells and use of these groundwater sources are mostly for the domestic and irrigation purposes. Approximate depth of these wells varies from 20 feet from 400 feet.
Most of the samples were collected from the villages. Villagers consume groundwater as such for drinking, agriculture and cattle feeding purposes. Groundwater samples from the Ratlam areas was of dark brown colour in appearance particularly from the areas viz., Dosigaon, Bhatuni and Jadwasa may be because of leaching of industrial wastewater into the ground water stream. However, there is no surface flow of industrial wastewater in Dosigaon industrial nallah (drain). Water for drinking purpose in these areas is being supplied by District Administration. Pesticides were detected in some samples of Ratlam region, which may be due to industrial influences or/and agricultural activities. Estimation of certain heavy metals and physico-chemical parameters like TDS,. Sulphates, chlorides etc., may be due to industrial influences. Bacterial contamination in the groundwater may be due to anthropogenic activities. It is proposed to stop the use of groundwater particularly from Dosigaon, Ghatla, Bhajan kheda, Bhatuni and Jadwasa immediately and treated water should be supplied for human consumption and agricultural purposes in these areas.
Korba (Chhattisgarh)
Korba is an integral part of the Mahanadi river basin and is located over either the bank of river Hasdeo, also known as the powerhouse of Chhatisgarh State. The total population of the city is around 11.00 lakh. Due to the abundance of the natural resources, Korba area has been developed as an industrial centre. Total 3650 MW power is being generated from four numbers of power plants i.e. M/s. National Thermal Power Corporation, M/s. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board (East) & (West) and M/s. Balco Captive Power Plant in this area. In addition to the power plant generation, aluminium metal is also being produced by M/s. Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd., at Korba. M/s. Indo Burma explosive plant is also being operated in this area where the nitrogen salt based explosives are being produced. Total 11 numbers of coal mines (open cast/underground) of SECL are also being operated in the area. Topography is undulating with elevation ranging from 9-332 meter above mean sea level. For the study of groundwater quality, the samples were collected during May, 2002, September, 2002 and January, 2003. The details of the sampling locations are presented in Table 5.21.
No changes observed in the groundwater quality with respect to pH and conductivity in compared to study made during 1994. Slight reduction in the mineral content i.e. chloride, calcium, magnesium, nitrate, chloride, sodium, potassium etc. recorded during the present study as compared to study made earlier. Pesticide content in the groundwater in the study area was also got reduced. Heavy metal content of all the tubewells/hand pumps are within the limit prescribed for drinking water quality except iron.
|
Location code |
Location name |
Approximate Depth (Meter) |
Type |
Current use |
|
G-1 |
Parsabhata Village, Near Motilal Sarthi’s House, (No. 51/7) |
42.42 |
Hand Pump |
Drinking |
|
G-2 |
Rampura Village, Near I.T.I adjesent to abondoned C.S.E.B. Ash dyke |
90.90 |
Hand Pump
|
Drinking |
|
G-3 |
Shivagi Nagar, Adjecent to M.IG. 100 |
36.36 |
Hand Pump
|
Drinking |
|
G-4 |
Rugbahari village, Infront of Anganbadi and besides Primary School |
72.72 |
Hand Pump
|
Drinking |
|
G-5 |
On the base of NTPC ashdyke at MCC-6 |
12.12 |
Tube- Well |
Drinking and industrial use |
|
G-6 |
Old bus stand, (infront of Mr. Sushil Kumar Agarwal’s House |
21.21 |
Hand Pump
|
Drinking |
Reduction in bacteriological contamination in almost all the locations were observed. From the study, it was revealed that impact of industrial/urban activities is not affecting the groundwater quality. The groundwater quality has been improved as compared to earlier study.
Groundwater Monitoring in Major Cities
Groundwater quality of three major cities in Uttar Pradesh (Lucknow, Kanpur and Ghaziabad) and one city in Haryana (Faridabad - Ballabhgarh) is being monitored through a network of 38 representative locations. At each location, monitoring during pre- and post-monsoon phase is to be undertaken. The monitoring of post-monsoon phase at each location has been completed.
The conductivity, fluoride and chloride content at each location was higher. At one location in Ghaziabad, excessive colour has been found.
In all the cities, the total coliform count was high, and at some places faecal coliform was also present.
At all the locations, the iron content was high and chromium content was exceeding at 12 locations. In Kanpur, hexavalent chromium (a more harmful state) was recorded at one location.
Groundwater Quality in Metropolitan Cities
Assessment of groundwater quality in metropolitan cities of Lucknow, Ludhiana, Agra, Meerut, Faridabad and Jaipur is carried out to know the deterioration and identification of polluting sources.
It is observed that the increased abstraction has lowered the water table and increased the salinity (total dissolved solids), fluoride and lead levels in Agra and Faridabad region, whereas the quality in other cities found satisfactory with respect to major cations and anions.
Status of arsenic contamination in ground water of West Bengal
In the state of West Bengal, 9 out of total 18 districts are effected by arsenic. In the effected area, people are suffering from different arsenic related diseases. The inclined trend of human exposure to arsenic through ground water has become a major concern in West Bengal. Based on literature survey it may be mentioned that the area and population in nine arsenic effected districts, out of 18 districts in West Bengal are 38865 km2 and 42.7 million respectively. Though all the people in this area are not exposed to arsenic contaminated water but most of them are at risk. Presently it is reported that 6 million people are exposed to unsafe level of arsenic contaminated water. Regular survey revealed more and more villages were being effected. It was also reported that water abstracted from 15-40m depth is most vulnerable. Arsenic contamination of ground water is attributed to leaching of arsenic from the rocky substrate in the deltaic belt of West Bengal. Over withdrawal of ground water through tube wells has aggravated the problem. One of the most important pre-requisite is to have reliable method to measure the arsenic in tubewell water. Number of arsenic field kits are being used for detection of arsenic. Performance of arsenic field kits was thoroughly studied in collaboration with School of Environmental Studies, Jadavpur University. The study revealed that most of field kits were not capable to generate reliable data. The rate of false detection was very significant and that caused lot of confusion not only among the decision makers but also among the local people (already published in American Chemical Society).
Considering the above fact, the study was undertaken to standardise the methodology for measurement of arsenic in ground water giving emphasis on quality control system to help the local people for analysis of tube well water and also to monitor the status of tube well water in arsenic effected area.
Based on recovery study using Standard Reference Material (SRM) traceable to NIST and inter-laboratory comparison, all the analytical factors were optimised to perform the analysis by hydride generation (VGA) – flame AAS. Facilities were also developed to analyse the sample by Ag-DDS method for cross checking. The laboratory has already established Good Laboratory Practice (GLP), protocols for sample preservation, storage, processing and analysis and quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) measures.
Field survey was conducted to select arsenic effected area to collect the samples for characterisation of ground water. The results revealed that out of 189 tube well water samples collected randomly from various parts of four district ( 24, paragnas (S&N), Hooghly and Murshidabad ), 43 samples were above the permissible limit. The arsenic content in 60 sample were between 10 and 50 ug/l which were above WHO guidelines. The frequency of arsenic level and status are shown below in table 5.22. Though number of sample were very limited considering the number of tube wells in effected area but these result revealed that 54 percent tube well are effected at present. Also characterisation of ground water was done with respect to other parameters.
|
Conc. Range (m g/l) |
Frequency |
Status |
|
< 10 |
86 |
Safe |
|
10 – 50 |
60 |
Above WHO Guidelines |
|
> 50 |
43 |
Above WHO Guidelines |
|
Total |
189 |
In 24 Parganas (S) the hardness of the ground water is significantly high and alkalinity is slightly high but dissolved solids were within permissible limit of drinking in most of the cases. The nitrate, phosphate, sulphate and chloride in ground water was within permissible limit.
In the Hugli, except hardness, dissolved solids (few cases) and calcium, almost all other parameters were within permissible limit. In Murshidabad, Ca and Total hardness in almost all the samples were significantly high. In 24 Parganas (N), Total hardness and sulphate were significantly high. Detail characterisation was made to evaluate the acceptability of water for domestic uses in terms of arsenic and other parameters and also to have idea to select the technology for arsenic removal.
Groundwater Quality Monitoring in Problem area Singrauli
Central Pollution Control Board, Zonal Office Kanpur carried-out monitoring of groundwater in Singrauli area through a network of six locations (Table 5.23). With reference to BIS- specifications (IS : 10500; 1991) for drinking water quality, groundwater quality status as observed in Singrauli area, during the current study is summarized below:
Physico-chemical and bacteriological parameters
Groundwater quality in the area has been generally observed to be alkaline and with moderate concentration of fluoride and colour. With regard to location specific status, the quality observed at Obra (Code : SG1) has shown alkalinity, total hardness, boron and calcium exceeding the norms. Presence of total and faecal coliform has also been noted.
At Renukoot (Code : SG2) high content of colour, alkalinity, TDS, and boron have been observed. At the other location in Renukoot (Code : SG3) high content of fluoride, colour, total and faecal coliform have been observed. At Renusagar (Code SG4) and at Anpara (SG5) groundwater has high to very high content of fluoride (Fig 5.4). Moreover the high content of chloride, sulphate, nitrate and colour at Anpara has also been a significant observation. The presence of total and faecal coliform observed very high at Renusagar are however absent at Anpara. At Bina (Code : SG6) apart from high colour content and coliform (total as well as faecal) the groundwater is of reasonably good quality.
Heavy Metals
Mercury and iron have been the only predominant metals in the area. While iron has been observed with high to very high concentration at almost all the locations with its highest concentration (10.2 mg/l) observed at Anpara (Code : SG5), mercury too has been reported from all the locations except at Renukoot(Code SG2). Highest concentration of mercury ( 0.004 mg/l) has been reported from Renukoot(Code SG3) followed by Renusagar (code SG4), Bina (Code SG6), Obra (Code SG1) and Anpara (Code SG5). All the other heavy metals have been found to be within prescribed norms.
|
Station code |
Location |
Approx.
depth of |
Type |
Justification for selection |
|
SG1 |
Downstream of fly- ash pond of Obra Thermal Power Plant, Obra |
10 |
Sump-well |
Impact of ash pond overflow and seepage from ash pond of Obra Thermal Power Plant |
|
SG2 |
Premises of Rotary Health Centre, Near Radha Krishna Temple, Renukoot |
12 |
Handpump |
Impact of Red-Mud disposal and Fly Ash Pond of M/s HINDALCO Renukoot and effluent of M/s Hi-Tech Carbon, Renukoot |
|
SG3 |
Sheo Park Bazar, near HINDALCO gate , Renukoot |
15 |
Handpump |
Impact of effluent from M/s HINDALCO Renukoot and M/s Kanoria Chemical Industries, Renukoot |
|
SG4 |
Renusagar Intermediate College, Renusagar, Anpara |
15 |
Open-well |
Impact of over flow and seepage from ash-pond of M/s Renusagar Power Company, |
|
SG5 |
Type-IV Flats, Anpara Thermal Power Plant Township Anpara |
12 |
Handpump |
Impact of over flow and seepage from ash-pond of M/s Anpara Thermal Power Plant |
|
SG6 |
Behind Bina Stadium Varanasi-Shaktinagar highway Bina |
15 |
Handpump |
Impact of Coal Mining Operations |
Pesticides
Lindane, DDT and aldrine have been the predominant pesticides observed. Among all, lindane has been reported at 4 out of 6 locations and its highest concentration (277 ng/l) is recorded at Renukoot (Code SG3), followed by Anpara (Code SG5), Renukoot (Code SG2) and Bina (Code SG6). DDT has been recorded at 2 locations viz.: Obra (SG1) and at Bina (SG6), the former location reported highest concentration of 216.2 ng/l. Aldrine was recorded only at Bina (Code : SG6).