![]() |
![]() |
AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT
5.10 AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT DURING 2001
The air quality of different cities/towns with respect to three criteria pollutants has been compared with the respective NAAQS and has been categorized into four broad categories based on an Exceedence Factor (the ratio of annual mean concentration of a pollutant with that of a respective standard). The Exceedence Factor (EF) is calculated as follows:
Observed annual mean concentration of criteria pollutant
Observed annual mean concentration of criteria pollutant
Exceedence Factor = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual standard
for the respective pollutant and area class
The four air quality categories are:
It is obvious from the above categorization, that the locations in either of the first two categories are actually violating the standards, although, with varying magnitude. Those, falling in the third category are meeting the standards as of now but likely to violate the standards in future if pollution continues to increase and is not controlled. However, the locations in Low pollution category have a rather pristine air quality and such areas are to be maintained at low pollution level by way of adopting preventive and control measures of air pollution.
The data for air quality assessment of 183 monitoring locations (in 64 cities/towns), out of which 83 are in residential, 98 in industrial and 2 in sensitive areas have been analysed for air quality assessment. At 17 locations (7 residential and 10 industrial) data were insufficient (< 50 monitoring days in the year) with respect to gaseous pollutants and at 35 locations (18 residential, 16 industrial and 1 sensitive) with respect to SPM. Such locations have not been considered for air quality assessment (Table 5.24).
Table 5.24 Ambient air quality status of various cities/towns during 2001
|
Annual Mean Concentration Range (µg/m3)
|
||||||||||
|
Pollution level |
Industrial (I) |
Residential (R) |
||||||||
|
SO2 & NO2 |
SPM |
SO2 & NO2 |
SPM
|
|||||||
|
Low (L) |
0-40 |
0-180 |
0-30 |
0-70 |
||||||
|
Moderate (M) |
40-80 |
180-360 |
30-60 |
70-140 |
||||||
|
High (H) |
80-120 |
360-540 |
60-90 |
140-210 |
||||||
|
Critical (C) |
>120 |
>540 |
>90 |
>210 |
||||||
|
STATE / CITY |
SO2 |
NO2 |
SPM |
|||||||
|
AREA CLASS |
I |
R |
I |
R |
I |
R |
||||
|
Andhra Pradesh |
||||||||||
|
Hyderabad |
L |
L |
M |
M |
M |
H |
||||
|
Vishakhapatnam |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
H |
||||
|
Assam |
||||||||||
|
Guwahati |
- |
L |
- |
L |
- |
H |
||||
|
Bihar |
||||||||||
|
Patna |
- |
L |
- |
L |
- |
C |
||||
|
Chhattisgarh |
||||||||||
|
Bhilai |
L |
L |
L |
M |
M |
H |
||||
|
Korba |
- |
L |
- |
L |
- |
M |
||||
|
Raipur |
L |
L |
M |
M |
M |
H |
||||
|
Delhi |
||||||||||
|
Delhi |
L |
L |
L |
H |
H |
C |
||||
|
Gujarat |
||||||||||
|
Ahmedabad |
L |
L |
M |
M |
H |
C |
||||
|
Goa |
||||||||||
|
Ponda |
- |
L |
- |
L |
- |
M |
||||
|
Vasco |
L |
- |
L |
- |
M |
- |
||||
|
Himachal Pradesh |
||||||||||
|
Damtal |
- |
L |
- |
L |
- |
- |
||||
|
Parwanoo |
L |
L |
L |
L |
- |
- |
||||
|
Paonta Sahib |
L |
- |
L |
- |
- |
- |
||||
|
Shimla |
- |
L |
- |
L |
- |
- |
||||
|
Haryana |
||||||||||
|
Yamuna Nagar |
L |
- |
L |
- |
M |
- |
||||
|
Faridabad |
L |
L |
L |
L |
M |
C |
||||
|
Jharkhand |
||||||||||
|
Dhanbad |
- |
L |
- |
M |
- |
C |
||||
|
Jharia |
L |
- |
L |
- |
M |
- |
||||
|
Jamshedpur |
L |
M |
M |
M |
M |
C |
||||
|
Sindri |
L |
- |
L |
- |
M |
- |
||||
|
Karnataka |
||||||||||
|
Bangalore |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
H |
||||
|
Mysore |
L |
- |
L |
- |
L |
- |
||||
|
Kerala |
||||||||||
|
Cochin |
L |
L |
L |
L |
M |
C |
||||
|
Chingavanam |
L |
- |
L |
- |
- |
- |
||||
|
Kottayam |
L |
L |
L |
L |
- |
- |
||||
|
Kozhikode |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
M |
||||
|
Thiruvananthapuram |
L |
L |
L |
L |
- |
- |
||||
|
Palakad |
L |
- |
L |
- |
L |
- |
||||
|
Maharashtra |
||||||||||
|
Mumbai |
L |
L |
L |
L |
M |
C |
||||
|
Chandrapur |
L |
L |
M |
M |
L |
H |
||||
|
Nagpur |
L |
L |
L |
L |
M |
C |
||||
|
Nasik |
L |
M |
L |
L |
M |
C |
||||
|
Pune |
L |
M |
M |
C |
L |
C |
||||
|
Solapur |
L |
L |
M |
M |
H |
C |
||||
|
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||||||
|
Bhopal |
L |
L |
L |
L |
- |
- |
||||
|
Indore |
L |
L |
L |
L |
- |
- |
||||
|
Jabalpur |
- |
- |
- |
L |
- |
- |
||||
|
Nagda |
M |
M |
M |
M |
- |
- |
||||
|
Satna |
L |
L |
L |
L |
- |
- |
||||
|
Meghalaya |
||||||||||
|
Motinagar |
- |
L |
- |
L |
- |
M |
||||
|
Orissa |
||||||||||
|
Angul |
L |
L |
L |
L |
M |
M |
||||
|
Rourkela |
L |
L |
L |
L |
M |
H |
||||
|
Talcher |
L |
- |
L |
- |
L |
- |
||||
|
Rayagada |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
M |
||||
|
Punjab |
||||||||||
|
Gobindgarh |
L |
- |
L |
- |
M |
- |
||||
|
Jalandhar |
L |
L |
L |
M |
M |
C |
||||
|
Ludhiana |
L |
L |
L |
M |
- |
- |
||||
|
Rajasthan |
||||||||||
|
Alwar |
L |
L |
M |
H |
H |
C |
||||
|
Jaipur |
L |
L |
L |
M |
M |
C |
||||
|
Kota |
L |
L |
L |
L |
M |
C |
||||
|
Udaipur |
L |
L |
- |
- |
M |
H |
||||
|
Jodhpur |
L |
L |
L |
L |
H |
C |
||||
|
Tamil Nadu |
||||||||||
|
Chennai |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
M |
||||
|
Coimbatore |
- |
- |
- |
- |
L |
L |
||||
|
Madurai |
L |
L |
L |
M |
L |
C |
||||
|
Salem |
- |
L |
- |
L |
- |
L |
||||
|
Uttaranchal |
||||||||||
|
Dehradun |
L |
L |
L |
L |
M |
C |
||||
|
Uttar Pradesh |
||||||||||
|
Agra |
- |
L |
- |
L |
- |
C |
||||
|
Anpara |
M |
- |
M |
- |
M |
- |
||||
|
Gajroula |
L |
- |
L |
- |
H |
C |
||||
|
Kanpur |
L |
L |
L |
M |
H |
C |
||||
|
Lucknow |
- |
L |
- |
M |
M |
C |
||||
|
Varanasi |
- |
L |
- |
L |
- |
C |
||||
|
Ghaziabad |
- |
- |
- |
- |
M |
- |
||||
|
West Bengal |
||||||||||
|
Haldia |
L |
- |
M |
- |
L |
- |
||||
|
Howrah |
L |
L |
M |
M |
M |
H |
||||
|
Kolkata |
L |
L |
H |
H |
M |
C |
||||
|
Chandigarh |
- |
- |
- |
- |
M |
H |
||||
|
Pondichery |
- |
L |
- |
L |
L |
M |
||||
Note : ‘-‘ - Data Not Available/Inadequate
Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)
It is observed that all the locations conformed to the respective standards. Fig. 5.5 depicts the annual mean concentration of SO2 vis-à-vis number of monitoring stations.
Fig 5.5 Annual mean concentration of Sulphur
Dioxide (various ranges)Ten locations of industrial and residential categories having highest values of annual mean concentration of Sulphur Dioxide are listed in Table 5.25.
Table 5.25 Ten locations having highest concentration of Sulphur Dioxide
|
S. No |
Industrial |
Residential |
||||
|
Location |
State |
Annual mean conc. (µg/m3) |
Location |
State |
Annual mean conc. (µg/m3) |
|
|
1. |
Anpara Colony, Anpara |
U.P. |
53 |
Sakchi water tower, Jamshedpur |
Jharkhand |
49 |
|
2. |
Renusagar Colony, Anpara |
U.P. |
51 |
Poud Phata, Kothrud, Pune |
Maharashtra |
46 |
|
3. |
PCMC Chinchawad, Pune |
Maharashtra |
47 |
Grasim Kalyan Kendra, Nagda |
M.P. |
45 |
|
4. |
Chemical Division Labour Club, Nagda |
M.P. |
46 |
Nasik Municipal Corpn. Building, Nasik
|
Maharashtra |
32 |
|
5. |
Burmamines Water Tower, Jamshedpur |
Jharkhand |
39 |
Kapoor Hotel, Hazratganj, Lucknow |
U.P. |
28 |
|
6. |
Bhosai, Pune |
Maharashtra |
37 |
Mahanagar, Lucknow |
U.P. |
28 |
|
7. |
Raunaq Auto Ltd, Gajraula |
U.P. |
36 |
RTO Colony Tank, Nasik
|
Maharashtra |
27 |
|
8. |
Laghu Udyog Nigam Ltd., Bhilai |
Chhattisgarh |
28 |
Visak Hostel, Sec.-4, Bhilai
|
Chhattisgarh |
27 |
|
9. |
MIDC, Chandrapur |
Maharashtra |
28 |
Hamidia Road, Bhilai
|
Chhattisgarh |
26 |
|
10 |
Kathivakkam, Chennai |
Tamil Nadu |
26 |
Sub-R. Office, Bapat Nagar, Chandrapur |
Maharashtra |
25 |

Percent violation with respect to 24-hourly standards is depicted in Figure 5.6. During 2001, at one residential location (Nagda, Madhya Pradesh), 24-hourly values exceeded the respective standards.
Based on the analysis of air quality data (AMC) at all the monitoring stations and pollution level categorization, the status of SO2 levels during 2001 is presented in Fig 5.7.

Oxides of Nitrogen (as NO2)
The annual mean concentration of Nitrogen dioxide vis-à-vis number of monitoring stations is presented in Fig. 5.8. It is observed that at two industrial and four residential locations, the NO2 level exceeded the annual standards of NO2.
Fig 5.8 Annual mean concentration of Nitrogen Dioxide (various range)
The annual standards of Industrial and Residential areas exceeded in the cities of Pune, Kolkatta, Alwar and Delhi. Table 5.26 enlists locations having top ten highest values of annual mean concentration of Nitrogen dioxide.
Table 5.26 Ten Locations Having Highest Concentration of Nitrogen Dioxide|
Industrial |
Residential |
|||||
|
S.No |
Location |
State |
Annual mean conc. (µg/m3) |
Location |
State |
Annual mean conc. (µg/m3) |
|
1. |
Mandai/Swargate, Pune |
Maharashtra |
90* |
Poud Phata, Kothrud, Pune |
Maharashtra |
94* |
|
2. |
Cossipore, Kolkatta |
West Bengal |
87* |
Lal Bazar, Kolkatta |
West Bengal |
82* |
|
3. |
RIICO Pump House, Alwar |
Rajasthan |
73 |
Regional Office, Alwar |
Rajasthan |
72* |
|
4. |
Howrah Munic. Coprn., Howrah |
West Bengal |
71 |
Town Hall, Delhi |
Delhi |
70* |
|
5. |
Gaurav Solvex, Alwar |
Rajasthan |
71 |
Sakchi Water Tower, Jamshedpur |
Jharkhand |
56 |
|
6. |
Super Market, Haldia |
West Bengal |
62 |
Sarojini Nagar, Delhi |
Delhi |
53 |
|
7. |
Anpara Colony, Anpara |
U.P. |
59 |
Kasba, Kolkatta |
West Bengal |
52 |
|
8. |
Bandhaghat, Howrah |
West Bengal |
58 |
Sub-R.O., Bapat Nagar, Chandrapur |
Maharashtra |
51 |
|
9. |
Renusagar Colony, Anpara |
U.P. |
57 |
Bator, Howrah |
West Bengal |
50 |
|
10 |
Bhosai, Pune |
Maharashtra |
53 |
Chitale Clinic, Solapur
|
Maharashtra |
47 |
Percent violations with respect to 24-hourly standards is depicted in Fig. 5.9. The number of locations where either annual mean or 24-hourly concentration exceeded the standards of NO2 for more than 5% times are listed in Table 5.27 During 2001, three industrial and six residential locations violated the 24-hourly standards of NO2 for more than 5% of the times.
|
Table
5.27 : Locations where either annual mean or 24-hourly Nitrogen Dioxide
concentration violated respective standards |
||||
|
Location |
State |
Area Class |
Annual Mean Conc. (µg/m3) |
% Exceedence Over 24-Hourly Standards |
|
Mandai/Swargate, Pune |
Maharashtra |
Industrial |
90 |
11 |
|
Cossipore, Calcutta |
West Bengal |
Industrial |
87 |
19 |
|
N.Y. SCHOOL, Sarojini Nagar, Delhi |
Delhi |
Residential |
53 |
13 |
|
Town Hall, Delhi |
Delhi |
Residential |
70 |
31 |
|
R.O. Dhanbad |
Jharkhand |
Residential |
32 |
12 |
|
Poud Phata (Kothrud), Pune |
Maharastra |
Residential |
94 |
66 |
|
Regional Office, Alwar |
Rajasthan |
Residential |
72 |
13 |
|
Lal-Bazar, Kolkatta |
West Bengal |
Residential |
82 |
48 |
|
Kasba, Kolkatta |
West Bengal |
Residential |
52 |
21 |
Status of NO2
Based on the analysis of air quality data at all the monitoring stations and pollution level categorization, NO2 is reported as high at one industrial, four residential and one critical location in the country. It is observed that NO2 violation is mainly in the State of West Bengal (Kolkatta), Rajasthan (Alwar), Maharashtra (Pune) and Delhi (Fig 5.10).
Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM)
The annual mean concentration of SPM vis-à-vis number of monitoring stations is presented in Fig. 5.11. It is observed that at one sensitive, 8 industrial and 58 residential locations, SPM level exceeded annual standards. Table 5.28 enlists the ten locations having top ten highest values of SPM in the country.
Fig. 5.11 Annual Mean Concentration of
SPM (various ranges)
Table 5.28 Ten locations having highest concentration of SPM
|
Industrial |
Residential |
|||||
|
S. No |
Location |
State |
Annual Mean Conc. (µg/m3) |
Location |
State |
Annual Mean Conc. (µg/m3) |
|
1. |
G. Solvex, Alwar |
Rajasthan |
537* |
Town Hall, Delhi |
Delhi |
561* |
|
2. |
Basni Indl. Area, RIICO Office, Jodhpur |
Rajasthan |
474* |
Gandhi Maidan Test Centre, Patna |
Bihar |
536* |
|
3. |
Lajpat Nagar, Kanpur |
U.P. |
471* |
Regional Office, Bodla, Agra |
U.P. |
476* |
|
4. |
M/s A.C..Pvt.Ltd., Fazalganj, Kanpur |
U.P. |
441* |
Sojati Gate, Jodhpur |
Rajasthan |
474* |
|
5. |
Raunaq Auto Ltd., Gajraula |
U.P. |
426* |
Regional Office, Jodhpur |
Rajasthan |
450* |
|
6. |
WIT Campus, Colapur |
Maharashtra |
403* |
Reg. Off., Jawahar Nagar, Varanasi |
U.P. |
416* |
|
7. |
Shahzada Bagh, Delhi |
Delhi |
378* |
Deputy Ka Parao, Kanpur |
U.P. |
413* |
|
8. |
Shardaben Hospit., Ahmedabad |
Gujarat |
366* |
Chitale Clinic, Solapur |
Maharashtra |
411* |
|
9. |
M.A.D.A., Jharia |
Jharkhand |
359 |
H.P.O., Kanpur |
U.P. |
406* |
|
10 |
M/s Atlas Cycles (I) Ltd., Ghaziabad |
U.P. |
357 |
F&T Centre, K. Nagar, Kanpur |
U.P. |
403* |
* - Locations where annual mean concentration of SPM exceeded the respective standards of 360 µg/m3 for Industrial and 140 µg/m3 for Residential areas.
The annual mean concentration of SPM exceeded the standard for industrial area at 8 locations in the state of Uttar Pradesh (3), Rajasthan (2), Delhi (1), Maharashtra (1) and Gujarat (1).
The annual mean concentration of SPM exceeded the standard for residential areas in 58 locations spread over the states of Andhra Pradesh (2), Assam (1), Bihar (2), Chhattisgarh (2), Chandigarh (1), Delhi (4), Gujarat (2), Haryana (1), Jharkhand (2), Karnataka (1), Kerala (3), Maharashtra (10), Orissa (1), Punjab (2), Rajasthan (10), Tamil Nadu (1), Uttarakhand (1), Uttar Pradesh (9) and West Bengal (3).
The details of locations wherein 24-hourly values of SPM exceeded the standards for more than 5% of the times are shown in the Fig. 5.12. Table 5.29 provides the number of stations where either AMC or 24-hourly concentration (more than 5% of the times) exceeded the respective standards. During 2001, one sensitive (Tajmahal at Agra), 20 industrial and 62 residential locations violated the 24-hourly values of SPM for more than 5% of times.
Fig 5.12 Percent violation of 24-hourly
standards (Suspended Particulate Matter)
Table 5.29 Locations
where either Annual Mean or 24-hourly Suspended
Particulate Matter concentration violated respective standards
|
State |
Number of Monitoring Locations Exceeding Standards |
||
|
Industrial |
Residential |
Sensitive |
|
|
Andhra Pradesh |
- |
3 |
- |
|
Assam |
- |
1 |
- |
|
Bihar |
- |
2 |
- |
|
Delhi |
2 |
4 |
- |
|
Karnataka |
- |
1 |
- |
|
Gujarat |
1 |
2 |
- |
|
Haryana |
1 |
1 |
- |
|
Jharkhand |
1 |
2 |
- |
|
Chhattisgarh |
- |
3 |
- |
|
Goa |
- |
1 |
- |
|
Kerala |
1 |
3 |
- |
|
Maharashtra |
1 |
11 |
|
|
Orissa |
- |
2 |
- |
|
Punjab |
- |
2 |
|
|
Rajasthan |
- |
2 |
- |
|
Tamil Nadu |
- |
1 |
- |
|
Uttar Pradesh |
5 |
9 |
1 |
|
Uttarakhand |
1 |
1 |
- |
|
Chandigarh |
1 |
1 |
- |
|
West Bengal |
- |
3 |
- |
|
Total |
14 |
55 |
1 |
Status of SPM
Based on the analysis of Annual Mean Concentration at all the monitoring stations and pollution level categorization, the status of SPM during 2001 (Fig. 5.13) is reported to be critical at 39 locations and high at 19 locations in residential area and high at 8 locations in industrial area.
Non-attainment Areas
Non-attainment areas for the three pollutants indicate that SPM is the major problem affecting nearly all the cities, NO2 in the cities of Alwar in Rajasthan and Pune in Maharashtra. Air Pollution problem is wide spread in 59 cities, where at least one criteria pollutant exceeded either annual or 24-hourly standards in any of the monitoring locations.
Table 5.30 shows the number of stations violating annual standards and 24-Hourly standards for more than 2% of the times in the year 2001 with respect to individual criteria pollutant. It is quite evident that SPM is the major problem in the residential areas of most of the cities/towns. Some of the observations on air pollution in cities are as follows:
It should be noted that the data are lacking for quite a few stations due to various reasons such as non-operation of monitoring stations due to paucity of fund, lack of equipment, lack of infrastructure and inadequate manpower.
Table 5.30 Number of stations violating Annual and 24-hourly standards|
Area Class |
SO2 |
NO2 |
SPM |
|||
|
24-Hourly |
Annual |
24-Hourly |
Annual |
24-Hourly |
Annual |
|
|
Residential |
1 |
- |
9 |
4 |
65 |
58 |
|
Industrial |
- |
- |
3 |
1 |
30 |
8 |
|
Sensitive |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
|
Total |
1 |
0 |
12 |
5 |
96 |
67 |
5.11 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING IN DELHI
The Air quality monitoring studies have been conducted using Ambient air quality monitoring van at different locations during June , 2002 and January – February, 2003 . Air monitoring for SO2, NO2, RSPM and CO was conducted at each location for 24 hours. The data is presented in Table 5.31 and 5.32.
SO2 and NO2 concentration was recorded well within the permissible limit on all monitoring locations while RSPM exceeded the limit. 8 hourly CO concentration has a mixed trend against the permissible limit.
Findings (Monitoring during June, 2002)
The overview of air quality at various locations based on subjective assessment of monitoring data has been presented in Table 5.31. The monitoring study depict following findings :-
Findings (Monitoring during January – February, 2003)
The overview of air quality monitoring was conducted at various locations in Delhi during January – February, 2003. The concentration of SO2, NO2 and O3 remained well within the permissible limit at all the locations. The concentration of RSPM remained very high at all locations which ranged between 92 m g/m3 and 409 m g/m3. The concentration of CO was within permissible limit at Lawrence Road Indl. Area, Badli Industrial Area and Campus of Presentation Convent School near Red Fort whereas the concentration of CO remained above permissible limit in few shifts at Windsor Place, Sarai Kale Khan and S.P. Marg (Dhaula Kuan).
Table 5.31 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring at different locations in Delhi|
S. No. |
Monitoring Location |
Average Concentration (m g/m3) |
|||
|
SO2 |
NO2 |
RSPM |
CO |
||
|
1. |
East Patel Nagar |
37 |
75 |
456 |
2612 |
|
2. |
ITO Intersection |
24 |
39 |
113 |
401 |
|
3. |
NOIDA More |
23 |
31 |
367 |
1003 |
|
4. |
Lado Sarai |
22 |
30 |
167 |
135 |
|
5. |
Lawrence Road |
26 |
30 |
428 |
364 |
WINDSOR PLACE
|
S. No. |
DATE |
NO2 (m g/m3) |
SO2 (m g/m3) |
O3 (m g/m3) |
RSPM (m g/m3) |
CO (8 hourly Avg.) (m g/m3) |
||
|
24 hrs. Avg. |
24 hrs. Avg. |
24 hrs. Avg. |
24 hrs. Avg. |
(06.00-14.00) |
(14.00-22.00) |
(22.00-06.00) |
||
|
01. |
06 - 01 - 03 |
73 |
22 |
11 |
185 |
1350 |
2230 |
918 |
|
02. |
07 - 01 - 03 |
65 |
13 |
12 |
187 |
2010 |
1870 |
532 |
|
03. |
08 - 01 - 03 |
45 |
25 |
15 |
259 |
1140 |
4760 |
3200 |
|
04. |
09 - 01 - 03 |
50 |
47 |
16 |
409 |
1480 |
8330 |
9040 |
|
05. |
10 - 01 - 03 |
44 |
18 |
05 |
182 |
1590 |
2150 |
1040 |
LAWRENCE ROAD IND. AREA
|
S. |
DATE |
NO2 |
SO2 |
O3 |
RSPM |
CO (8 hourly Avg.) (m g/m3) | ||
|
24 hrs. Avg. |
24 hrs. Avg. |
24 hrs. Avg. |
24 hrs. Avg. |
(06.00-14.00) |
(14.00-22.00) |
(22.00-06.00) |
||
|
01. |
13 - 01 - 03 |
10 |
16 |
15 |
318 |
1930 |
3100 |
1830 |
|
02. |
14 - 01 - 03 |
09 |
31 |
15 |
350 |
2450 |
4070 |
2230 |
|
03. |
15 - 01 - 03 |
14 |
24 |
19 |
400 |
1890 |
4630 |
4000 |
|
04. |
16 - 01 - 03 |
09 |
15 |
09 |
281 |
2920 |
3290 |
1820 |
|
05. |
17 - 01 - 03 |
64 |
15 |
15 |
311 |
2250 |
3860 |
4610 |
BADLI INDUSTRIAL AREA
|
S. |
DATE |
NO2 (mg/m3) | SO2
(mg/m3) |
O3 |
RSPM |
CO
(8 hourly Avg.) (m g/m3) |
||
|
24 hrs. Avg. |
24 hrs. Avg. |
24 hrs. Avg. |
24 hrs. Avg. |
(06.00-14.00) |
(14.00-22.00) |
(22.00-06.00) |
||
|
01. |
20 - 01 - 03 |
69 |
33 |
09 |
248 |
1900 |
2100 |
1770 |
|
02. |
21 - 01 - 03 |
62 |
52 |
12 |
328 |
1360 |
2320 |
2170 |
|
03. |
22 - 01 - 03 |
75 |
54 |
14 |
343 |
1110 |
1980 |
2880 |
|
04. |
23 - 01 - 03 |
82 |
58 |
19 |
333 |
1900 |
2150 |
2420 |
SARAI KALE KHAN
|
S. No. |
DATE |
NO2 (mg/m3) |
SO2 (m g/m3) |
O3 |
RSPM |
CO
(8 hourly Avg.) (m g/m3) |
||
|
24 hrs. Avg. |
24 hrs. Avg. |
24 hrs. Avg. |
24 hrs. Avg. |
(06.00-14.00) |
(14.00-22.00) |
(22.00-06.00) |
||
|
01. |
27 - 01 - 03 |
51 |
22 |
10 |
92 |
1300 |
2460 |
1410 |
|
02. |
28 - 01 - 03 |
36 |
16 |
04 |
- |
- |
2170 |
1220 |
|
03. |
29 - 01 - 03 |
44 |
17 |
15 |
115 |
1210 |
2000 |
2120 |
|
04. |
30 - 01 - 03 |
46 |
12 |
08 |
128 |
1250 |
1640 |
678 |
|
05. |
31 - 01 - 03 |
31 |
09 |
04 |
- |
723 |
1090 |
570 |
S. P. MARG, DHAULA KUAN
|
S. |
DATE |
NO2
(m g/m3) |
SO2 (m g/m3) |
O3 (m g/m3) |
RSPM (m g/m3) |
CO (8 hourly Avg.) (m g/m3) |
||
|
24 hrs. Avg. |
24 hrs. Avg. |
24 hrs. Avg. |
24 hrs. Avg. |
(06.00-14.00) |
(14.00-22.00) |
(22.00-06.00) |
||
|
01. |
03 - 02 - 03 |
12 |
15 |
14 |
153 |
1450 |
2120 |
1530 |
|
02. |
04 - 02 - 03 |
59 |
14 |
17 |
162 |
1440 |
2340 |
1100 |
|
03. |
05 - 02 - 03 |
51 |
16 |
20 |
208 |
1660 |
3520 |
4020 |
|
04. |
06 - 02 - 03 |
62 |
13 |
21 |
194 |
1100 |
3660 |
4790 |
|
05. |
07 - 02 - 03 |
57 |
23 |
21 |
1459 |
1410 |
2910 |
3240 |
RED FORT , (PRESENTATION CONVENT SCHOOL)
|
S. No. |
DATE |
NO2 (m g/m3) |
SO2 (m g/m3) |
O3 (m g/m3) |
RSPM (m g/m3) |
CO (8 hourly Avg.) (m g/m3) |
||
|
24 hrs. Avg. |
24 hrs. Avg. |
24 hrs. Avg. |
24 hrs. Avg. |
(06.00-14.00) |
(14.00-22.00) |
(22.00-06.00) |
||
|
01. |
13 - 02 - 03 |
15 |
15 |
21 |
189 |
944 |
1880 |
1270 |
|
02. |
14 - 02 - 03 |
21 |
14 |
21 |
213 |
1340 |
1520 |
1260 |
|
:- |
Above the limit of 80 µg/m3 for SO2 and NO2 |
|
|
:- |
Above the limit of 2000 µg/m3 for CO |
|
|
:- |
Above the limit of 100 µg/m3 for RSPM |
Volatile Organic Compounds (Benzene, Toluene and Xylene) in the Ambient Air of Delhi
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are defined technically as organic compounds having a saturation vapour pressure greater than 10-1 Torr at 25 0 C and standard atmospheric pressure. It can be classified into six categories namely alkanes, alkenes, alkyenes, aromatics, halogen compounds and carboxyl compounds. The BTX (Benzene Toluene and Xylene) compounds come under aromatic category of volatile organic compound. BTX are mainly released from anthropogenic activities such as transportation (from vehicle exhaust, filling and evaporative losses), industrial processes, combustion etc. BTX are harmful pollutants causing exposure-related health affects in human beings.
Central Pollution Control Board is regularly conducting BTX monitoring using diffusive samplers (passive sampling method) on fortnightly basis at seven locations (Ashok Vihar, I.T.O, J.N.U., Moti Nagar, East Arjun Nagar, Siri Fort, Town Hall) in Delhi. After the required sampling period the diffusive tubes are transported to the laboratory. The activated charcoal of the tube is extracted with Carbon disulphide (CS2) and analysed using Gas Chromatograph with Flame Ionisation Detector (FID).The data is processed on monthly average basis. Mean concentration of BTX (Benzene, Toluene and Xylene) at different locations in Delhi (January to April 2002 and December 2002) is depicted in Fig 5.14. The mean concentration of Benzene ranged between 14 µg/ m3 (J.N.U) and 26 µg/ m3 (I.T.O). The maximum (98 µg/ m3) and minimum (23 µg/m3) concentration of Toluene were observed at Moti Nagar and J.N.U.respectively.The mean concentration of Xylene ranged between 8 µg/ m3 (J.N.U) and 31 µg/ m3 (I.T.O).
Monitoring of Volatile Organic Matter (VOC) levels in Vadodara Ambient Air
During winter season few important carcinogenic volatile organic compounds like Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene and m,p-Xylene were also measured round the clock by using continuous automatic VOC monitor. Results on hourly average basis were compared with their threshold limits to find trend of diurnal variation and identify particular hours when they exceeded their limits. VOCs were measured in the winter season by using automatic VOC analyzer at Subhanpura, a residential area. The measured values presented in Table 5.33. Results shows the measured average Benzene levels varied between 5.93 µg/ m3 and 20.5 µg/m3 and higher values were observed during midday to mid night. The measured average Toluene levels varied between BDL to 33.24 µg/m3 and average Ethyl Benzene levels varied between 3.35 µg/m3 and 23.65 µg/m3.
The average values of m+p Xylene varied between BDL and 3.11µg/m3 and BDL and 12.26 µg/m3. The trends of variation of all other measured VOC species were more or less similar except Ethyl Benzene. The higher values of Ethylene Benzene were encountered in the morning (9 AM –10 AM) and in the night hours (6 PM to 10 PM) also. However, other VOCs did not show similar trend, the peak values were encountered in daytime only. The measured average VOCs were exceeded the threshold limit during both the year because of high number of Vehicles plying on the road, un-burnt vehicular fuel, poor meteorological conditions and adulteration in Fuel. As VOCs are carcinogenic, it should be a serious concern to the local authority of Vadodara city to stop adulteration and improve traffic management.
Table 5.33 Hourly levels of VOC species in Air of Vadodara
|
Hours
|
Benzene µg/m3
|
Toluene µg/m3
|
E-Benzene µg/m3 |
m+p-Xylene µg/m3 |
o-xylene µg/m3 |
|
0-1 |
7.06 |
BDL |
4.17 |
0.16 |
BDL |
|
1-2 |
6.56 |
BDL |
3.35 |
0.37 |
BDL |
|
2-3 |
5.94 |
1.01 |
5.64 |
0.16 |
BDL |
|
3-4 |
5.93 |
BDL |
4.70 |
0.66 |
2.99 |
|
4-5 |
5.97 |
BDL |
5.96 |
0.95 |
BDL |
|
5-6 |
4.84 |
BDL |
4.84 |
0.52 |
BDL |
|
6-7 |
5.67 |
BDL |
5.76 |
0.59 |
BDL |
|
7-8 |
7.81 |
2.38 |
9.46 |
0.94 |
1.28 |
|
8-9 |
7.54 |
4.21 |
16.02 |
1.18 |
BDL |
|
9-10 |
9.99 |
3.65 |
19.18 |
0.37 |
BDL |
|
10-11 |
20.56 |
28.31 |
14.74 |
3.11 |
12.26 |
|
11-12 |
8.64 |
2.90 |
12.58 |
0.22 |
BDL |
|
12-13 |
10.64 |
33.24 |
4.37 |
2.34 |
7.93 |
|
13-14 |
11.97 |
7.83 |
7.69 |
BDL |
BDL |
|
14-15 |
15.32 |
3.68 |
13.58 |
BDL |
BDL |
|
15-16 |
11.65 |
2.00 |
8.98 |
0.21 |
BDL |
|
16-17 |
11.50 |
5.78 |
12.07 |
0.13 |
BDL |
|
17-18 |
10.81 |
3.43 |
18.07 |
0.32 |
BDL |
|
18-19 |
17.51 |
7.87 |
22.54 |
1.05 |
3.82 |
|
19-20 |
14.66 |
5.55 |
21.39 |
0.86 |
4.66 |
|
20-21 |
12.80 |
5.70 |
23.65 |
0.94 |
BDL |
|
21-22 |
10.27 |
3.28 |
16.02 |
1.22 |
BDL |
|
22-23 |
8.66 |
2.10 |
10.99 |
0.51 |
BDL |
|
23-24 |
9.33 |
2.23 |
12.20 |
0.50 |
BDL |
|
Thresh-old Limit |
6.7 |
11.6 |
1.69 |
4.85 |
|
Benzene Toluene and Xylene (BTX) Level Measurments in the Ambient Air of Bangalore City
In the light of benzene and its derivatives presence in the auto exhaust emissions and their harmful effects on the public health an online monitoring systems to measure above said components in the ambient air near Zonal Office building at Rajajinagar was commissioned. Though the system is not stabilized, yet the pollutant levels recorded between Nov. 2002 to March, 2003 (Winter months) are presented in Table 5.34.
Table 5.34 BTX Levels at Bangalore|
TIME INTERVAL |
BENZENE |
TOULENE |
ETHYL-BENZENE |
M.P.-XYLENE |
0-XYLENE |
|
12 MID NIGHT TO 4 AM |
20 |
46 |
8 |
32 |
1.5 |
|
4 AM TO 8 AM |
9 |
19 |
4 |
14 |
3 |
|
8 AM TO 12 NOON |
21 |
48 |
9 |
37 |
11 |
|
12 NOON TO 4 PM |
20 |
49 |
9 |
36 |
5 |
|
4 PM TO 8 PM |
39 |
99 |
19 |
64 |
24 |
|
8 PM TO 12 MID NIGHT |
31 |
78 |
16 |
58 |
22 |
Note: All values are expressed in ppb
On-line BTX Monitoring in Delhi (Using Mobile Van) :
CPCB initiated On-line BTX monitoring since Nov. 2000 subsequently at different selected locations and results published earlier. The monitoring of BTX in ambient air was continued during year 2001 & 2002 using mobile van fixed with continuous online BTX analyser (MLU 950 of Synspec) near foot over bridge at BSZ Marg, I.T.O., Jhilmil Industrial Area, G.T.Road, Shahdara, National Physical laboratory, Pusa Road, Hotal Taj Palace, Dhaula Kuan, Safdarjung Hospital, Britannia Chowk, Ring Road, Sindhu Border, Alipur Village, Bara Hindu Rao and G.T.Road,Shahdara . Results of monitoring of BTX in µg/m3 are shown in Table 5.35 and Fig 5.15, which indicate that:
|
Locations
|
Period
|
Benzene
|
Toluene
|
m,p-Xylene
|
o-Xylene
|
Ethyl-Benzene
|
|
ITO, BSZ Marg |
Apr. 2001 |
7.5 |
24.0 |
14.9 |
6.6 |
4.8 |
|
Jhilmil Ind.Area |
Apr. 2001 |
5.6 |
14.5 |
9.6 |
4.2 |
3.1 |
|
NPL, Pusa Road |
May. 2001 |
2.3 |
5.1 |
1.4 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
|
Hotel Taj Palace |
Sept.2001 |
6.0 |
16.3 |
6.3 |
2.6 |
1.8 |
|
SafdarJang Hospita |
Sept.2001 |
9.5 |
27.5 |
11.2 |
4.5 |
3.4 |
|
ITO, BSZ Marg |
Sep-Oct.2001 |
10.1 |
31.4 |
15.1 |
6.0 |
4.4 |
|
Britania Industrry chowk |
Oct.2001 |
15.5 |
50.2 |
15.9 |
6.8 |
5.0 |
|
Sindhu Border |
Apr. 2002 |
2.7 |
16.1 |
4.0 |
1.4 |
1.0 |
|
Alipur Village |
Apr. 2002 |
3.0 |
7.5 |
2.8 |
1.1 |
0.8 |
|
Bara Hindu Rao |
Apr. 2002 |
6.9 |
22.8 |
13.4 |
5.8 |
4.5 |
|
G.T.Road,Shahdara |
May. 2002 |
2.7 |
14.2 |
8.3 |
4.1 |
2.6 |
On-line BTX Monitoring in Delhi (Stationary Continuous Analysers) :
On line BTX monitoring in Delhi at Siri Firt and ITO (BSZ Marg) have been initiated from August 2002 .
Average, Maximum and Minimum monthly Benzene levels at Siri fort are presented in Table 5.36 and Fig 5.16, which shows gradual increase in the levels from August 2002 to March , 2003.
Average, Maximum and Minimum monthly Benzene levels at ITO are presented in Table-5.36 and Figure-5.15, which shows gradual increase in the levels from August 2002 to March , 2003.
Overall Average benzene levels were generally observed higher at ITO as compared to Siri Fort probably due to higher traffic density.
Table 5.36 Average Benzene Levels(m
g/m3) in Ambient Air of Siri Fort and|
Location/Month |
Average Benzene Levels(m g/m3) |
|
Siri Fort |
|
|
August, 2002 |
6.94 |
|
September, 2002 |
7.48 |
|
October,2002 |
20.03 |
|
November,2002 |
- |
|
December, 2002 |
- |
|
January, 2003 |
- |
|
February, 2003 |
5.91 |
|
March, 2003 |
2.70 |
|
ITO (BSZ Marg) |
|
|
August, 2002 |
4.76 |
|
September, 2002 |
8.81 |
|
October,2002 |
25.76 |
|
November,2002 |
39.93 |
|
December, 2002 |
37.23 |
|
January, 2003 |
13.69 |
|
February, 2003 |
11.3 |
|
March, 2003 |
2.83 |
Diurnal Variation :
Half hourly observations (Fig 5.17) indicate that concentration of all measured components remain prevalent since evening time till midnight which reflect that Benzene compound do not dissipate into the environment immediately after it’s release. They persist in the lower atmosphere during dark and comparative cooler temperature in the night until oxidized during daylight. It is observed that Benzene level build up in high conc. for a longer duration at Traffic intersection as compared to residential area especially during winter season.
Active BTX Sampling Followed By ATD-GC Analysis
Instrumental methods are being calibrated and standardised for BTX analysis using Active (pumped) sampling techniques followed by Automated Thermal Desorption-Gas Chromatography analysis. Samples are collected at selected locations i.e. traffic intersection, petrol pump and residential areas for shorter period (two-three hours) using low flow pump at different time intervals including peak and lean traffic periods.
Results of selected locations are depicted in Fig 5.18, which reflect following observations.
Breakthrough was observed
during active (low flow pumped) sampling even at 20ml/minute flow rate when
Tenax, Coconut Charcoal were used. Therefore, selection of suitable adsorbents
is to be made through further experimental work using different adsorbent
like Chromosorb 106 etc at different flow rate and different sources and atmospheric
conditions.
Ambient Air Quality in Delhi during Year 2002
Central Pollution Control Board has been conducting ambient air quality monitoring of criteria pollutants at seven locations in Delhi. The locations have been categorized based on land use i.e., residential, industrial and traffic intersection. The comparison of ambient air quality data during 2002 with previous years (Fig 5.19 to 5.24) indicate that:
Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Monitoring in the Ambient Air of Delhi
Particulate Matter is the term used for a mixture of solid particles and liquid droplets found in the air. PM2.5 refers to particulate matter that is 2.5 micrometers or smaller in size. The sources of PM2.5 include fuel combustion, power plants, wood burning, industrial processes and diesel powered vehicles. These fine particles are also formed in the atmosphere when gases such as sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and volatile organic compounds are transformed in the air by chemical reactions. Fine particles are of concern because they are risk to both human health and environment. Because these particles are so small they penetrate to the deepest part of the lungs. Scientific studies have suggested links between fine particulate matter and numerous health problems including bronchitis, acute and chronic respiratory symptoms such as shortness of breath and painful breathing. These fine particles also have a great affinity for water thus contributing to acid rain. Acid rains affects things biological or man made thus affecting the environment.
This problematic cycle is why CPCB has taken initiative to monitor and address fine particles in the atmosphere. Monitoring is being conducted employing portable samplers (Air Metrics) based on the principle of impaction. Preliminary results (Figure 5.25) of monitoring, conducted at BSZ Marg, Delhi indicates alarmingly high concentration of PM2.5. Monthly mean concentration of PM 2.5 between February and July, 2002 ranged between 46 m g/m3 to 153 m g/m3. On an average, PM2.5 constituted 50% of PM 10 and 25% of TSPM (Total Suspended Particulate Matter). It was observed that the 24 hourly values had exceeded the USEPA limit of 65 m g/m3 on 95% of days on which monitoring was conducted. Considering the health effects, it is necessary to monitor PM2.5 at more number of locations in Delhi and other urban centers of the country to assess its levels and for taking mitigative measures.
Inspection of Authorised Vehicular Pollution Checking Centres in Delhi
Inspection of Vehicular Pollution Checking Centres (PCCs), authorised by Directorate of Transport (Govt. of NCT – Delhi) was conducted from November 28 to December 4, 2002 to check the operation, methodology and calibration of the instruments. 33 PCCs covering all the five zones, i.e. South, West, North, central and East Delhi were inspected during the programme. It was observed that the staff, deployed at the PCCs need regular training to improve their skills and appraise them of the steps, being taken for reducing vehicular pollution. The following recommendations and suggestions have been made :-
Recommendations
Suggestions
Monitoring at Delhi
Ambient noise level monitoring was carried out at various locations in Delhi, i.e. All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Lajpat Nagar, New Friends Colony, East Patel Nagar, Connaught Place, India Gate, Mayur Vihar, Patel Nagar and Kamla Nagar on the occasion of Deepawali festival. At Kamla Nagar noise monitoring was conducted from 17.00 hrs. to 23.00 hrs. while at other lcoations, short duration (half hourly) noise level monitoring was conducted between 17.00 hrs. and 23.00 hrs.. The average Leq noise level value for short duration at 8 monitored locations ranged between 54 dB(A) and 68 dB(A). The Leq noise level at Kamla Nagar ranged between 63 dB(A) and 83 dB(A).
Ambient air quality monitoring was also carried out at ITO Intersection and Ashok Vihar using manual monitoring techniques and at East Patel Nagar (Pusa Road) using the mobile monitoring van.
The meteorological conditions were not favourable for dispersion of pollutants which attributed to the higher concentration of measured pollutants (SPM and RSPM). During the monitoring period, the weather was calm and most of the time in the day, wind speed was less than 0.3 m/sec. Even during rest of the period, the wind velocity was very low and the maximum hourly average wind speed recorded on Deepawali day was 0.9 m/sec.
Monitoring at Kanpur
Monitoring was conducted to assess noise pollution due to firing of crackers in the area of Govindpuri (Residential cum commercial), Kanpur. There has been substantial increase in noise level due to firing of crackers on 4th November, 2002.
It was observed that noise level (Leq) reached upto 80.3 dB (A) with maximum level of 103 dB(A) during Deepawali night. These levels (Table 5.37) are far more than the prescribed limit and might have left detrimental effect on human health.
Table 5.37 Noise Level During Deepawali Festival in Kanpur City|
S. No. |
Location |
Date |
Time |
Leq |
Peak |
Lmax |
Lmin |
|
1 |
Govind Nagar (R+C) |
01.11.02 |
18.50 to 19.20 |
67.5 |
100.7 |
81.4 |
56.2 |
|
2 |
Govind Nagar (R+C) |
01.11.02 |
00.15 to 00.45 |
54.8 |
91.3 |
76.2 |
44.8 |
|
3 |
Govind Nagar (R+C) |
02.11.02 |
11.00 to 11.30 |
69.3 |
106.5 |
88.4 |
59.2 |
|
4 |
Govind Nagar (R+C) |
02.11.02 |
18.05 to 18.35 |
69.3 |
110.1 |
83.5 |
59.8 |
|
12 |
Govind Nagar (R+C) |
04.11.02 |
16.10 to 16.40 |
71.5 |
110.3 |
91.9 |
59.1 |
|
13 |
Govind Nagar (R+C) |
04.11.02 |
18.30 to 19.00 |
71.1 |
110.2 |
87.8 |
58.9 |
|
14 |
Govind Nagar (R+C) |
04.11.02 |
19.49 to 20.19 |
77.4 |
119.4 |
96.5 |
63.6 |
|
15 |
Govind Nagar (R+C) |
04.11.02 |
20.32 to 21.02 |
80.3 |
120.2 |
103.1 |
63.7 |
|
16 |
Govind Nagar (R+C) |
04.11.02 |
21.03 to 21.33 |
79.5 |
110.3 |
100.5 |
65.3 |
|
17 |
Govind Nagar (R+C) |
04.11.02 |
21.37 to 22.07 |
79.5 |
110.5 |
102.0 |
66.3 |
|
18 |
Govind Nagar (R+C) |
04.11.02 |
22.12 to 22.42 |
75.4 |
110.3 |
94.2 |
60.4 |
|
19 |
Govind Nagar (R+C) |
04.11.02 |
23.00 to 23.30 |
74.7 |
110.3 |
95.6 |
58.2 |
|
20 |
Govind Nagar (R+C) |
05.11.02 |
17.30 to 18.00 |
71.5 |
110.3 |
92.0 |
55.9 |