Table 6.4 : Locations where either annual mean or 24-hourly nitrogen dioxide
concentration violated respective National Ambient Air Quality standards

LOCATION

STATE

AREA
CLASS

ANNUAL 
MEAN NO2
CONC.
(µg/m3)

%  Exceedence
over 24-hourly
 standards

DIC, Udaipur

Rajasthan

Industrial

80.3

5

PIPDIC Ind Estate Mettupalayam, Pondicherry

Pondichery

Industrial

85.0

Nil

RIICO Pump House,  Alwar

Rajasthan

Industrial

80.4

Nil

ABIDS, Hyderabad

Andhra Pradesh

Residential

55.1

14

R.O. Dhanbad

Bihar

Residential

57.5

19

Town Hall, Delhi

Delhi

Residential

44.0

8

R.C. High School, Ahmedabad

Gujarat

Residential

56.8

38

Housing Board's Office, Sectional Office, Pondichery

Pondicherry

Residential

57.4

14

Regional Office, Alwar

Rajasthan

Residential

75.2

18

Regional Office, Udaipur

Rajasthan

Residential

62.0

13

Town Hall, Udaipur

Rajasthan

Residential

69.2

22

Barkhera, Kota

Rajasthan

Sensitive

26.1

26

Based on the analysis of  air quality data at all the monitoring stations and pollution level categorization, the status of Annual Mean Concentration of NO2 during 1998 is presented in the Fig 6.6. NO2 is reported to be high at two industrial and three  residential locations in the country. It is observed that NO2 violation has been recorded mainly in the state of Rajasthan (Udaipur,  Alwar & Kota).


Fig 6.6 Status of Nitrogen Dioxide in terms of high, moderate and low Exceedence Factor


6.1.4   Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM)


The annual mean concentration of SPM vis-à-vis number of monitoring stations is presented in Fig. 6.7. It is observed SPM level exceeded annual standards at two locations of sensitive area, 12  locations in industrial and 50 locations in residential area. Table 6.5 enlists the ten locations having top ten highest values of SPM in the country.


Fig. 6.7 Range of Annual Mean Concentration of SPM
vis-à-vis Number of monitoring stations

Table 6.5 Ten locations having highest concentration of  SPM 
during the year – 1998

 

Industrial

Residential

S. No

Location

State

Annual Mean SPM Conc. (µg/m3)

Location

State

Annual Mean SPM
Conc. (µg/m3)

1.

Talkatora, Lucknow

Uttar Pradesh

524

Gandhi Maidan Test Centre, Patna

Bihar

521

2.

M/s A. Chem. P.Ltd., Fazalganj, Kanpur

Uttar Pradesh

523

Deputy Ka Parao, Kanpur

Uttar Pradesh

514

3.

Poud Phata (Kothrud), Pune

Maharashtra

487

F. & T. Centre, Kidwai Nagar, Kanpur

Uttar Pradesh

485

4.

MADA, Jharia

Bihar

454

Kapoor Hotel,  Lucknow

Uttar Pradesh

479

5.

C.I.T.D., Balanagar, Hyderabad

Andhra Pradesh

440

Goyal Market, Mahanagar, Lucknow

Uttar Pradesh

416

6.

Irumpanam, Cochin

Kerala

421

R.O. Jawahar Nagar, Varanasi

Uttar Pradesh

416

7.

D. I. C., Udaipur

Rajasthan

388

Hamidia Road, Bhopal

Madhya Pradesh

406

8.

Escorts Medical Centre, Faridabad

Haryana

386

Sojati Gate, Jodhpur,

Rajasthan

396

9.

Govindpura, Bhopal

Madhya Pradesh

384

Siri Fort, Delhi

Delhi

384

10

Association of Inds., Pologround, Indore

Madhya Pradesh

382

Regional Office,
Alwar

Rajasthan

342

·       The annual mean concentration of SPM exceeded the National Ambient Air Quality Standard at industrial areas  of 12 cities in the state of Karnataka (1), Bihar (1), Delhi (1), Haryana (1), Kerala (1), Maharashtra (1), Madhya Pradesh (3),  Rajasthan (1) and U.P. (2).

·      The annual mean concentration of SPM exceeded National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for residential areas at 50 locations spread over the states of Andhra Pradesh (2),  Bihar (3), Chandigarh (1),  Delhi (2),  H.P. (1),  Karnataka (1), Kerala (2), Maharashtra (8), M.P. (11), Orissa (2), Rajasthan (8), Tamil Nadu (1), U.P. (7), and Pondicherry (1).

·      Three locations in sensitive areas located at Taj Mahal, Agra (U.P.), Barkhera, Kota (Rajasthan) and Tekka Bench Ridge, Shimla (H.P.) depicted exceedance of the annual mean concentration National Ambient Air Quality Standard of SPM.

The details of locations wherein 24-hourly values of SPM exceeded the  NAAQS for more than 5% of the times are shown in the Fig. 6.8. Table 6.6 provides the number of stations, where either Annual Mean Concentration or 24-hourly concentration (more than 5% of the times) exceeded the respective standards.  During 1998, three locations sensitive areas ( Tajmahal at Agra, Barkhera at Kota and Tekka Bench Ridge at Shimla),  21 locations at industrial area and 54 locations at residential areas violated the 24-hourly values of SPM for more than 5% of the times.


Fig 6.8 Percent violation of 24-hourly Ambient Air Quality Standards
(Suspended Particulate Matter)

Table 6.6 Locations where either Annual Mean or 24-hourly Suspended Particulate Matter concentration violated respective National Ambient Air Quality Standards

State

Number of Monitoring Locations exceeding standards

Industrial

Residential

Sensitive

Andhra Pradesh

2

3

 

Bihar

1

3

 

Delhi

3

2

 

Haryana

1

-

 

Himachal Pradesh

-

2

1

Karnataka

-

1

 

Kerala

3

2

 

Madhya Pradesh

3

11

 

Maharashtra

1

9

 

Orissa

-

3

 

Punjab

-

   

Rajasthan

6

8

1

Tamil Nadu

-

3

 

Uttar Pradesh

2

7

1

Chandigarh

1

1

 

Pondicherry

-

1

 

Total

23

56

3


Based on the analysis of  air quality data at all the monitoring stations and pollution level categorization, the status of the Annual Mean Concentration of SPM during 1998 (Fig. 6.9) is reported to be critical at 30 and high at 20 residential locations. Also at 12 industrial locations SPM values have been reported high.


Fig. 6.9 Status of Suspended Particulate Matter level in terms of critical,
high, moderate and low Exceedence Factor

6.1.5  Air Quality Overview

Ø      Air Pollution problem is wide spread in 59 cities, where at least one criteria pollutant exceeded either annual or 24-hourly standards among the monitoring locations.

Ø      Table 6.7 shows the number of stations violating annual standards and 24-Hourly standards for more than 2% of the times in the year 1998 with respect to individual criteria pollutant. It is quite evident that SPM has been the major problem in the residential areas of most of the cities/towns in the country.

Table 6.7 Number of stations violating Annual and 24-hourly standards

Area Class

SO2

NO2

SPM

24-Hourly

Annual

24-Hourly

Annual

24-Hourly

Annual

Residential

6

1

13

3

22

50

Industrial

3

0

2

2

57

12

Sensitive

0

0

1

1

3

2

Total

9

1

16

6

82

64

Ø      High SPM level is the most prevalent form of air pollution.

Ø      Motor vehicles are major and most important source of pollution in almost all the mega cities.

Ø      High domestic use of coal or biomass fuel is still a serious problem resulting in high prevalence of SPM and SO2.

Ø      The current capabilities of the monitoring agencies to monitor, to collect information on  the sources and emissions needs strengthening.

Ø      The data has been inadequate for quite a few stations due to non-operation of monitoring stations, paucity of funds, lack of equipments, lack of infrastructure or inadequate man-power.