CHAPTER
XI
PROSECUTIONS
LAUNCHED, CONVICTIONS SECURED AND DIRECTIONS GIVEN FOR CLOSURE OF POLLUTING INDUSTRIES
POLLUTION
BY INDUSTRIES IN DELHI 11.1 WRIT
PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 4677 OF 1985, M.C. MEHTA VS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. The
matter relating to the industries located in residential/non-conforming area in
Delhi was decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its order, dated. 7.5.2004.
The Hon’ble court after considering the various aspects in the matter directed
as follows: 1.
All industrial units come up in residential/non-conforming areas in Delhi
on or after 1.8.1990 shall close down and stop operating as per the following
Schedule
- Industrial units pertaining
to extensive industries ‘F’ category within a period of four months
- Industrial
units pertaining to light and service industry (‘B’ to ‘F’) category within five
months.
- Impermissible
house hold industries (‘A’ Category) within six months.
- Six
Thousand Industrial Unit on waiting list for allotment of industrial plots within
18 months.
2. The Central Government is directed
to finalise the list of permissible house hold industries falling in category
‘A’ within a period of three months. 3.
Six Thousand Industrial units on waiting list shall be allotted industrial
plots within one year. 4. The
Delhi Government may announce a policy within six weeks to those industrial units,
which come to be established after 1.8.1990 and may close down on their own before
the expiry of the time fixed in this order. 5. The
Water and Electricity Connection of those industrial unit found operating after
the due date of closure shall be disconnected forthwith and in any case not later
then a month of the date fixed for closure. If the industrial activity still continues,
the premises shall be sealed within a period of not later then another month.
The
seal shall be removed and water and electricity connection restored only after
filing of an undertaking by the industrial unit not to recommence any sort of
industrial activity. 6. The
Central Government is directed to finalize within six months appropriate steps
to be taken for making NCR regions a success for industrial activity. The Government
of the adjoining States, U.P., Rajasthan and Haryana are directed to extend full
cooperation. 7. The
Municipal Corporation of Delhi shall consider within three months the aspect of
withdrawal of exemption notification. 8. A
monitoring committee is appointed comprising; (i) Chief Secretary of Delhi; (ii)
Commission of Police, Delhi; (iii) Commission, Municipal Corporation of Delhi
and (iv) Vice Chairman of Delhi Development Authority. The Committee will be responsible
for stoppage of illegal industrial activity. 9. The
first progress report by the Committee shall be filed by 31.8.2004 and thereafter
the further progress report be filed at least once in a period of every two months. POLLUTION
IN RIVER YAMUNA 11.2 WRIT
PETITION (C) NO.725/1994, NEWS ITEM ‘HT’ A.Q.F.M YAMUNA VS CENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL
BOARD & ORS. The
Writ Petition is related to the pollution in river Yamuna in Delhi area. The Central
Pollution Control Board is submitting its monitoring reports to the Hon’ble Supreme
Court. The monitoring report of the Central Pollution Control Board is on the
water quality of river Yamuna, at Palla, Agra Canal and at Okhla. The Central
Pollution Control Board also monitoring the drains at the point prior to discharge
into the river Yamuna for assessing the wastewater quality and pollution load
in river Yamuna. The river Yamuna is monitored for its water quality at five locations
along with 25 drains in compliance to the directions of Hon’ble Supreme Court
and has submitted the results of 83 rounds of monitoring since year 1999. MANAGEMENT
OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE IN CLASS-I CITIES 11.3 WRIT
PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 888 OF 1996, ALMITRA H. PATEL VS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. This
writ petition is related to the management of municipal solid waste in Class-I
cities in the country. In compliance of Hon’ble Supreme Court’s orders the Central
Board has submitted the annual reports as required under Rule 8 of the Municipal
Solid Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000. The Hon’ble Court on 26.7.2004
after considering the recommendations made by the Central Board in the Annual
Report 2002-2003 on implementation of Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling)
Rules, 2000 directed the State Governments and the Union Territories to respond
to the position emerging from the Annual Report. The Hon’ble court on 4.10.2004
has observed that the Ministry of Environment & Forest has requested to all
the State Pollution Control Boards to formulate time bound action plan for management
of municipal solid waste in respect of Metro Cities and State Capitals and the
Hon’ble Court further directed that the proposed action plan may also be filed
in the Court. HAZARDOUS
WASTE
11.4 WRIT PETITION
(CIVIL) NO. 657 OF 1995 STATUS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DIRECTIVES OF HON’BLE
SUPREME COURT As per the
Directives of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the matter of Writ Petition No.
(C) of 657 of 1995, dated October 14, 2003, the Central Pollution Control Board
(CPCB) is required to prepare and comply with the following directives: i) Preparation
& Issuance of Check list and ensuring its compliance; ii) Preparation
of Guidelines on HW incinerators; iii) Preparation
of Guidelines for proper functioning & up keep of disposal sites ; iv) Preparation
of guidelines for transportation of hazardous waste; v) National
Policy Document on Management of Hazardous Waste; vi) To
carry out random check of HW generating units, the inventory of which is submitted
by the SPCBs/PCCs. vii) To
carry out random cross checks on inventory of HW dump sites submitted by the SPCBs/PCCs
and evaluation of the rehabilitation plans of dumpsites. viii) Preparation
of Comprehensive report on Inventory of HW generation and HW dump sites and rehabilitation
plans of dump sites and ix) Co-ordination
with Ministry of Environment & Forests ( w.r.to preparation and finalization
of the draft Amendment to Hazardous Waste (M & H) Amendment Rules, 2003).
CPCB have
prepared afore said draft guidelines, as per the directives of the Hon’ble Supreme
Court, draft national policy document on management of hazardous waste, and proposed
amendment to Schedule 3,4 & 8 of the Hazardous Waste (M & H) Amendment
Rules, 2003. These drafts were circulated to all the State Pollution Control Boards
(SPCBs), Pollution Control Committees (PCCs) of Union Territories ( UTs), Members
of Supreme Court Monitoring Committee (SCMC), Ministry of Environment & Forests
(MoEF), Experts, CSIR laboratories and Environment Secretaries of all the State
Governments and others concerned with a request to provide their comments. Subsequently,
the comments received from various SPCBs/PCCs, Members of SCMC, Experts and others
concerned were considered and the following have been finalized:
- Check list for Issuance of Authorization;
- Guidelines
for Proper Functioning & Up keep of Disposal Sites;
- Guidelines
for Transportation of Hazardous Waste;
- Draft
on National Policy Document on management of Hazardous Waste;
- Draft
Amendment to Schedule 3, 4 & 8 of the Hazardous Waste (M & H) Amendment
Rules, 2003:
- Guidelines for Common Hazardous
Waste Incineration
TAJ
POLLUTION MATTER
11.5 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.13381/1984, M.C.MEHTA
VS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Air Quality Monitoring Stations at Agra In
compliance to the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court the Central Pollution
Control Board has established four air quality monitoring stations and one Central
Analytical-cum-Calibration Laboratory at Agra and monitoring the ambient air quality
at Taj Mahal, Itmad-ud-daula, Rambag and Nunhai. The data so generated from these
air quality monitoring stations are being submitted to the Hon’ble Supreme Court
and also displayed at Taj Mahal. Brick
Kiln Matter The
Hon’ble Supreme Court on 26.7.2004 observed that this Court has directed the Central
Pollution Control Board on 11.9.2003 to constitute a Committee. The Committee
was constituted for the purpose of considering all applications of brick kilns.
The hearing of the Committee will be held at Agra. The Committee can seek any
information and expert opinion from the officers; the orders passed by the said
committee shall be final. Applications which are at present being disposed of
by this order are dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file them before the
Committee. The applicants may submit all documents in support of their applications
before the Committee. The Committee will dispose of all the applications within
in four weeks from the date of their filing. The Hon’ble Court further clarified
that make it clear that we do not intent to alter or amend the order, dated 11.9.2003
in any form whatsoever. POLLUTION
IN GOMTI RIVER 11.6 WRIT
PETITION (CIVIL) NO.327 OF 1990, VINEET KUMAR MATHUR VS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The
writ petition is relating to pollution in Gomti River in Lucknow. The Hon’ble
Supreme Court on 4.11.2004 considered the matter relating to the Detailed Project
Report (DPR) in respect of inclusion of certain towns in the State of U.P. in
river action plan relating to the sewage discharge in river Gomti. The Hon’ble
Court directed the State of U.P. to sort out its problems with National River
Conservation Directorate (NCRD) regarding Detailed Project Report. All concerned
parties including Central Pollution Control Board to submit individual reports
relating to the required DPRs submitted by State of U.P. In compliance of the
Hon’ble Supreme Court’s order, dated 4.11.2004 the Central Board has submitted
its views with the recommendation that the maximum pollution load generated and
discharge into river Gomti is from Lucknow city and as a result BOD of river Gomit
increases. Therefore, the treatment of wastewater generated from Lucknow city
is to be taken on priority to improve water quality of river Gomti. The matter
is under consideration of the Hon’ble Court. POLLUTION
BY SLAUGHTER HOUSES 11.7 WRIT
PETITION (CIVIL) NO.309/2003, LAXMI NARIAN MODI VS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. A
Petition has been filed as a Public Interest Litigation in the Supreme Court of
India in the year 2003 for incineration of all animal wastes to be made mandatory
in all abattoirs, slaughter houses and meat processing units in the country and
make use of animal waste like meat and bones as poultry/animal feed. The Hon’ble
Supreme Court on 26.7.2004 directed the Central Pollution Control Board to collect
information from various State Pollution Control Boards/Pollution Control Committees
of UTs as to modes adopted in their respective areas for disposal of waste. The
State Pollution Control Boards/Pollution Control Committees also directed to cooperate
with the Central Pollution Control Board and supply the requisite information
within the time stipulated in the communication send by the Central Board. The
Central Board has collected the information from various State Pollution Control
Boards/Pollution Control Committees of UTs and submitted the status of the information
to the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The Hon’ble Supreme Court on 28.3.2005 observed
that the information as compiled by the Central Board shows a dismal position
in regard to the mode and manner of disposal of solid waste in slaughter houses
and most of the slaughter houses are being run without obtaining statutory consent.
The Hon’ble Court directed the Central Pollution Control Board and the Ministry
of Environment & Forests to submit what steps to be taken in respect of efficient
and proper disposal of solid waste from slaughter houses and running of slaughter
houses without statutory consent. The matter is pending for consideration of the
Hon’ble Supreme Court. INDUSTRIAL
POLLUTION IN THE STATES 11.8 WRIT
PETITION (CIVIL) NO.460/2004, GOA FOUNDATION VS UNION OF INDIA In
this matter the Hon’ble Supreme Court after considering the submissions of the
Ministry of Environment & Forests directed the Government of India to issue
requisite order directing closure of defaulting units which are continuing to
operate in violation of Environmental Laws. The Hon’ble Court also directed the
State Government to comply the statutory directions issued by the Government of
India. However the Hon’ble Court stayed the operation of the order, dated 2.3.2005
till the next date of hearing ACTION
PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT OF SILT IN BBMB PROJECTS 11.9 CIVIL
WRIT PETITION NO.777/2003, BHAKRA BEAS MANAGEMENT BOARD VS HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD & ORS. The
Bhakra Beas Management Board, Chandigarh has filed a petition in the High Court
of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in the year 2003 challenging the applicability of
the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974. The Hon’ble High Court
of Himachal Pradesh on 24.3.2004 directed the Ministry of Environment & Forests
and Central Pollution Control Board to examine the entire issue in its total and
true prospect and in coordination with every concerned including the Petitioner
Bhakra Beas Management Board and H.P. State Environment Protection and Control
Pollution Board and thereafter submit a comprehensive action plan. To comply with
the direction of the Hon’ble High Court, the Central Pollution Control Board in
consultation with the Ministry of Environment & Forests constituted an Expert
Committee for preparing the action plan for management of silt. The Expert Committee
after consideration of various aspect has prepared the action plan for management
of silt in environmentally and socio friendly manner. The final report of the
Expert Committee has been submitted before the Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh at Shimla for consideration. NOISE
POLLUTION 11.10 COURT
CASES REGARDING NOISE POLLUTION FROM GENERATOR SETS The
Ministry of Environment & Forests, Govt. of India notified the revised noise
limits for diesel generator sets vide GSR 371 (E), dated May 17, 2002 (and its
amendments). The noise limits became effective from 1.1.2005. Some manufacturers
have challenged this notification in various High Courts. The status of the cases
filed in the High Courts of Delhi, Kerala & Karnataka are as under:
| Sl.No |
WP(C) No. |
Matter |
Remarks |
| 1. |
18454/2004 Delhi
High Court | Indian
Generator Manufacturers Assn. Vs Union
of India & Another | Dismissed
for lack of territorial jurisdiction with liberty to approach the Court of competent
jurisdiction. | | 2. |
18453/2004 Delhi
High Court | M/s
D.P.K Engineers (P) Ltd. Vs Union
of India & Another | -do- |
| 3. |
18461/2004 Delhi
High Court | M/s
Ankitech (P) Ltd. Vs Union
of India & Another | -do- |
| 4. |
18462/2004 Delhi
High Court | M/s
Poduval Industries Vs Union
of India & Another | -do- |
| 5. |
18463/2004 Delhi
High Court | M/s
Genlite (P) Ltd. Vs Union
of India & Another | -do- |
| 6.. |
1532-52/2005 Delhi
High Court | M/s
BNP Enterprises & Others Vs CPCB |
Hon’ble High Court found no merit
of the case and hence dismissed on 8.2.2005. | |
7. |
18450 Delhi
High Court | M/s
Jakson & Company Vs Union
of India & Another | Hon’ble
High Court found no merit of the case and hence dismissed on 7.4.2005. |
| 8. |
5658 Kerala
High Court | M/s
Kerala Acoustics & Allied Products Manufacturers Association Vs Union
of India & Another | Pending. |
| 9. |
5351, 5352/2005 Karnataka
High Court | M/sCanara
Generators & Acoustics (P) Ltd & Others Vs. Union
of India & Another | Pending. |
11.11 NOTICES/DIRECTIONS
ISSUED UNDER SECTION 5 OF EPA, 1986
- M/s Birla Power Solutions Ltd.
was issued Show cause notice under Section 5 of Environment (Protection) Act,
1986 in January, 2004, for non-compliance with emission and noise limits. The
directions were confirmed in April, 2004 and the manufacturer was asked to recall
all two-stroke gensets sold and make them complaint with phase –II emission limits
applicable from June 1, 2001, before they are sent back to the customers. The
company was also asked to submit bank guarantee of Rs 0.81Crore until the recall
process is completed i.e till June, 2006. The matter is pending for disposal.
- Notices under Section 5 of the
Environment (Protection) Act were issued to 7 diesel genset manufacturers on March
10, 2005. These manufacturers were directed to install acoustic enclosure at the
customers end or replace the non-compliant diesel generator sets with compliant
diesel generator sets at their own cost.
11.12 DIRECTIONS
REGARDING NOISE POLLUTION FROM FIRE WORKS Based
on the noise level testing results conducted at IIT, Chennai and NPL, New Delhi,
directions were issued under Section 5 of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 to
15 (fifteen) firework industries, which do not comply with the noise standards
prescribed in G.S.R. 682 (E), dated 5th October, 1999. |