CHAPTER
XI PROSECUTIONS
LAUNCHED, CONVICTIONS SECURED AND DIRECTIONS GIVEN FOR CLOSURE OF POLLUTING INDUSTRIES
11.1 POLLUTION IN RIVER YAMUNA Writ
Petition (Civil) No.725/1994, News Items ‘HT’ A.Q.F.M. Yamuna Vs Central Pollution
Control Board & Ors. In
the above matter the Central Pollution Control Board is filing Monitoring Reports
in compliance of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The Central Pollution Control Board
submitted its monitoring report on water quality on River Yamuna at Palla, Agra
Canal and at Okhla. Besides river Yamuna the Central Board also monitor the drains
at the point prior to discharge into the river Yamuna for assessing the waste
water quality and pollution load. The Central Board is monitoring the river Yamuna
for its water quality at five locations along with 25 drains in compliance of
the orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and have submitted results of 71 rounds
of monitoring since 1999. Pollution
in Western Yamuna Canal The
Western Yamuna Canal is the source of raw water for drinking purposes for capital
city Delhi. Earlier, the Central Pollution Control Board has received several
complaints from Delhi Jal Board regarding bad quality of raw water in Westen Yamuna
Canal and thereby closure of Haiderpur and Nangloi water works for several hours.
The officials of the Central Board conducted a survey of the pollution sources
of Western Yamuna Canal. The survey revealed that the pollution in Western Yamuna
Canal is causing due to the industries located in Yamuna Nagar, Haryana and also
from the Municipal Council Yamunagar and Jagadhari (Sewage Treatment Plants).
On the basis of the survey the Central Board has issued directions under Section
5 of the Environment (Protecting) Act, 1986 to the industries located in the Yamuna
Nagar, Haryana. The Industries have filed Writ Petitions in the Punjab & Haryana
High Court at Chandigarh and got stay orders against the directions issued by
the Central Board. The Central Board has filed status of the Western Yamuna Canal
in the Supreme Court of India vide its affidavit, dated 15.10.2003 the Hon’ble
Court on 15.4.2004 directed that the reports of the Central Pollution Control
Board and Haryana State Pollution Control Board be sent to the Committee in the
Ministry of Environment & Forests for examination. The matter is under consideration
of the said Committee.
11.2 TAJ POLLUTION
MATTER Writ
Petition (Civil) No.13381/1984, M.C.Mehta Vs Union of India & Ors. Brick
Kilns Matter In
brick kiln matter the Hon’ble Supreme Court issued directions time to time from
the year 2001. On the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court a five member Joint
Inspection Committee was constituted in the year 2001. On the basis of the inspection
carried out by the Joint Inspection Committee, the Central Board submitted its
affidavit along with the inspection report of the Joint Inspection Committee.
Till dated on the directions of the Court approximately 125 brick kilns were inspection
by the said Joint Inspection Committee. The Hon’ble Court on 11.9.2003 after assessing
the present status of the brick kilns located in Agra, Firozabad, Hathras and
Etah. The Hon’ble Court directed the Chairman, Central Board to constitute a Committee
consisting of Direction, one representative each from the Archeological Survey
of India (ASI), Ministry of Environment & Forests, U. P. Pollution Control
Board and Central Pollution Control Board. The Hon’ble Court further directed
that the meeting of the said Committee would be held in Agra. The Committee may
seek any information or expert opinion from any person/officers and the orders
passed by the Committee shall be final. On the basis of the recommendations of
the Joint Inspection Committee, the Hon’ble Court also directed the brick kilns
owners before filing application to the said Committee or brick kilns will immediately
apply for electricity connection and the electric connection meant for agricultural
use will be disconnected by the electricity supplier. On the directions of the
Hon’ble Court the Chairman, Central Pollution Control Board has constituted a
Committee on 20.10.2003. Air
Quality Monitoring Station at Agra Pursuance
to the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court the Central Pollution Control Board
has established four Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations in Agra. These four
air quality monitoring stations are located at Taj Mahal, Itmad-Ud-Daula, Rambagh
and Nunhai besides one Central Analytical-cum-Calibration Laboratory. The data
generated from the air quality monitoring stations are being displayed at Taj
Mahal has suggested by Mahajan Committee. The Central Board has also initiated
a study to monitor very fine particles (PM2.5) besides chemical speciation, emission
inventory studies etc. with hardware and technical support from Environment Canada.
The Central Board is also in the process of developing ambient air quality standard
with respect to FPM (PM2.5). 11.3
POLLUTION IN ARAVALI HILLS
Writ Petition (Civil) No.4677/1985, M.C.Mehta
Vs Union of India & Ors. The
matter is related to the mining activities in area upto 5 k.m. from the Delhi-Haryana
border on the Haryana side of the Ridge and also in the Aravalli Hills. The Hon’ble
Court vide order, dated 18.3.2004 observed that with a view to monitor the overall
eco-restoration efforts in the Aravalli Hills and to provide technical support
in the implementing organizations and also to monitor the implementation of recommendations
of Environment Protection Control Authority (EPCA),
Central Empowered Committee (CEC) and Central Mine Planning and Design Institute
(CMPDI) to constitute a Monitoring Committee. The Hon’ble Court besides several
other directions directed the following heads of the Departments would be members
of the said Monitoring Committee:
- Regional Officer of State Pollution
Control Board;
- Forest Department;
- District
Administration;
- Department of Mining
and Geology’
- Irrigation Department;
- Regional
Officer of Central Ground Water Board (CGWB);
- Agricultural
Department;
- District Industry Department;
and
- Chairman, CPCB
Besides above, the Hon’ble Court further
directed the Ministry of Environment & Forests to appoint an officer from
Central Ground Water Board to be a member of the Monitoring Committee. The following
persons have also be members of the said Committee as representatives of the public:
- Prof. Dilip Biswas, Ex-Chairman,
CPCB
- Mr. Valimiki
Thapar
- Mr. Bhure Lal
The
Hon’ble Court directed that the Ministry of Environment & Forests will be
the nodal agency of the said Monitoring Committee. The Monitoring Committee was
directed to inspect the mines and file a report within a period of three months
containing the suggestions for recommencement of mining in individual cases. 11.4
GANGA POLLUTION MATTER Writ
Petition (Civil) No.3727/1985, M.C.Mehta Vs Union of India & Ors. In
the matter of Ganga Pollution the Central Pollution Control Board has filed an
Interlocutory Application in the Supreme Court seeking directions from the Hon’ble
Court in respect of the Municipalities/Nagar Palikas/Local Bodies located in the
State of Uttar Pradesh, Bihar to maintain properly and operate the sewage treatment
plant/sewerage system, pumping stations crematoria, low cost toilets and other
assets created under the Ganga Action Plan (GAP). The Hon’ble Supreme Court after
considering the submission of the Central Board directed that all the concerned
States and Municipal Councils to file necessary response indicating by the oxidations
ponds have not been erected and identify the land. In
response to the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court some of the Municipal
Councils have submitted their response in the Court which are pending for the
appropriate directions of the Court. 11.5
MANAGEMENT OF SOLID WASTE IN CLASS –I CITIES
Writ Petition (Civil) No.888/1996, Almitra
H. Patel & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors. In
this matter the Hon’ble Court on 3.2.2004 directed the Central Pollution Control
Board to submit through an Affidavit the compliance with Rule 8 of the Municipal
Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000. The Hon’ble Court further
directed that the State Pollution Control Boards and Pollution Control Committees
which have not submitted report in terms of Rule 8 of the aforesaid Rules shall
forthwith submit it to the Central Pollution Control Board. The Central Pollution
Control Board vide its affidavit, dated 3.3.2004 submitted in the Supreme Court
informed that three Annual Reports consecutively as required under Rule 8 of the
Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000 to the Ministry of
Environment & Forests for the year 2000-2001, 2001-2002 and 2002-2003. The
Central Board has indicated the performance and status of implementation of local
bodies (Municipalities) with respect to the provisions of the Municipal Solid
Wastes Rules. The Central Board has also made its recommendations in the Annual
Report submitted to the Ministry of Environment & Forests that (i) in the
first phase the Ministry of Environment & Forests may consider to direct concerned
States/UTs to formulate time bound action plans in respect Metro Cities and State
Capitals (35 Metro Cities and 24 State Capitals); (ii) the Ministry of Environment
& Forests/Central Pollution Control Board may continue to support States/UTs
for setting up of Demo Projects on cost sharing basis. The matter is under consideration
of the Hon’ble Court. 11.6
IMPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
Writ Petition (Civil) No.657 of 1995,
Research Foundation for Science Technology and National Resource Policy Vs Union
of India & Ors. The
progress in the matter during the period under the report is, the Hon’ble Supreme
Court vide order, dated 14.10.2003 directed that the Central Pollution Control
Board would be empowered to monitor the import of hazardous waste the Central
Pollution Control Board will collate the data from the State Pollution Control
Boards directly from each State Pollution Control Board and will randomly cross
check the data upto 10% of the units prior to preparing the National Inventory.
The Central Pollution Control Board also directed to study the reports of State
Pollution Control Boards and make an evaluation of the proposals, counter check
the data generated in the reports and produced a National Plan for Rehabilitation
of Hazardous Waste Dump Sites. Such plan should be submitted to the Hon’ble Court
within four months. |